Comparison study of portable bladder scanner versus cone‐beam CT scan for measuring bladder volumes in post‐prostatectomy patients undergoing radiotherapy. Issue 3 (5th March 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ung, KA; White, R; Mathlum, M; Mak‐Hau, V; Lynch, R
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology. Volume 58:Issue 3(2014:Jun.)
• Page Start: 377
• Page End: 383
• Publication Date: 2014-03-05
• Subjects: Radiology, Medical -- Periodicals; Radiology, Medical -- Australasia -- Periodicals; 616.0757
• DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12171
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1754-9477

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jmiro12171-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Introduction</title> <p>In post‐prostatectomy radiotherapy to the prostatic bed, consistent bladder volume is essential to maintain the position of treatment target volume. We assessed the differences between bladder volume readings from a portable bladder scanner (BS‐V) and those obtained from planning CT (CT‐V) or cone‐beam CT (CBCT‐V). Interfraction bladder volume variation was also determined.</p> </sec> <sec id="jmiro12171-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>BS‐V was recorded before and after planning CT or CBCT. The percentage differences between the readings using the two imaging modalities, standard deviations and 95% confidence intervals were determined. Data were analysed for the whole patient cohort and separately for the older BladderScan™ BVI3000 and newer BVI9400 model. Interfraction bladder volume variation was determined from the percentage difference between the CT‐V and CBCT‐V. Treatment duration, incorporating the time needed for BS and CBCT, was recorded.</p> </sec> <sec id="jmiro12171-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Fourteen patients were enrolled, producing 133 data sets for analysis. BS‐V was taken using the BVI9400 in four patients (43 data sets). The mean BS‐V was 253.2 mL, and the mean CT‐V or CBCT‐V was 199 cm<sup>3</sup>. The mean percentage difference between the two modalities was 19.7% (SD 42.2; 95%CI 12.4 to 26.9). The BVI9400 model produced more consistent readings, with a mean percentage difference of −6.2% (SD 27.8; 95% CI −14.7 to −2.4%). The mean percentage difference between CT‐V and CBCT‐V was 31.3% (range −48% to 199.4%). Treatment duration from time of first BS reading to CBCT was, on average, 12 min (range 6–27).</p> </sec> <sec id="jmiro12171-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>The BS produces bladder volume readings of an average 19.7% difference from CT‐V or CBCT‐V and can potentially be used to screen for large interfraction bladder volume variations in radiotherapy to prostatic bed. The observed interfraction bladder volume variation suggests the need to improve bladder volume consistency. Incorporating the BS into practice is feasible.</p> </sec> </abstract>