The concept of function in modern physiology. (1st June 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Roux, Etienne
• Is Part Of: Journal of physiology. Volume 592:Number 11(2014:Jun.)
• Page Start: 2245
• Page End: 2249
• Publication Date: 2014-06-01
• Subjects: Physiology -- Periodicals; 612.005
• DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.272062
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-3751

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>An overview of the scientific literature shows that the concept of function is central in physiology. However, the concept itself is not defined by physiologists. On the other hand, the teleological, namely, the 'goal‐directed' dimension of function, and its subsequent explanatory relevance, is a philosophical problem. Intuitively, the function of a trait in a system explains why this trait is present, but, in the early 1960s, Ernest Nagel and Carl Hempel have shown that this inference cannot be logically founded. However, they showed that self‐regulated systems are teleological. According to the selectionist theories, the function of an item is its effect that has been selected by natural selection, a process that explains its presence. As they restrict the functional attribution of a trait to its past selective value and not its current properties, these theories are inconsistent with the concept of function in physiology. A more adequate one is the causal role theory, for which a function of a trait in a system is its causal contribution to the functional capacity of the system. However, this leaves unsolved the question of the 'surplus meaning' of the teleological dimension of function. The significance of considering organisms as 'purpose‐like' (teleological) systems may reside not in its explanatory power but in its methodological fruitfulness in physiology. In this view, the teleological dimension of physiological functions is convergent to but not imported from, the teleological dimension of evolutionary biology.</p> </abstract>