Evaluation of a whole blood remote platelet function test for the diagnosis of mild bleeding disorders. (May 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Evaluation of a whole blood remote platelet function test for the diagnosis of mild bleeding disorders. (May 2014)
- Main Title:
- Evaluation of a whole blood remote platelet function test for the diagnosis of mild bleeding disorders
- Authors:
- Dovlatova, N.
Lordkipanidzé, M.
Lowe, G. C.
Dawood, B.
May, J.
Heptinstall, S.
Watson, S. P.
Fox, S. C.
for the UK GAPP Study Group - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="jth12555-abs-0001"> <title>Summary</title> <sec id="jth12555-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Mild platelet function disorders (PFDs) are complex and difficult to diagnose. The current gold standard test, light transmission aggregometry (LTA), including lumi‐aggregometry, is time and labour intensive and blood samples must be processed within a limited time after venepuncture. Furthermore, many subjects with suspected PFDs do not show a platelet abnormality on LTA.</p> </sec> <sec id="jth12555-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>To assess the diagnostic potential of an easy‐to‐use remote platelet function test (RPFT) as a diagnostic pre‐test for suspected PFDs.</p> </sec> <sec id="jth12555-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>A remote platelet function test was compared with lumi‐aggregometry in participants recruited to the Genotyping and Phenotyping of Platelets Study (GAPP, ISRCTN 77951167). For the RPFT, whole blood was stimulated with platelet agonists, stabilized with PAMFix and returned to the central laboratory for analysis of P‐selectin and CD63 by flow cytometry.</p> </sec> <sec id="jth12555-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>For the 61 study participants (42 index cases and 19 relatives) there was a good agreement between lumi‐aggregometry and the RPFT, with diagnosis being concordant in 84% of cases (κ = 0.668,<abstract abstract-type="main" id="jth12555-abs-0001"> <title>Summary</title> <sec id="jth12555-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Mild platelet function disorders (PFDs) are complex and difficult to diagnose. The current gold standard test, light transmission aggregometry (LTA), including lumi‐aggregometry, is time and labour intensive and blood samples must be processed within a limited time after venepuncture. Furthermore, many subjects with suspected PFDs do not show a platelet abnormality on LTA.</p> </sec> <sec id="jth12555-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>To assess the diagnostic potential of an easy‐to‐use remote platelet function test (RPFT) as a diagnostic pre‐test for suspected PFDs.</p> </sec> <sec id="jth12555-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>A remote platelet function test was compared with lumi‐aggregometry in participants recruited to the Genotyping and Phenotyping of Platelets Study (GAPP, ISRCTN 77951167). For the RPFT, whole blood was stimulated with platelet agonists, stabilized with PAMFix and returned to the central laboratory for analysis of P‐selectin and CD63 by flow cytometry.</p> </sec> <sec id="jth12555-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>For the 61 study participants (42 index cases and 19 relatives) there was a good agreement between lumi‐aggregometry and the RPFT, with diagnosis being concordant in 84% of cases (κ = 0.668, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.0001). According to both tests, 29 participants were identified to have a deficiency in platelet function and 22 participants appeared normal. There were four participants where lumi‐aggregometry revealed a defect but the RPFT did not, and six participants where the RPFT detected an abnormal platelet response that was not identified by lumi‐aggregometry.</p> </sec> <sec id="jth12555-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>This study suggests that the RPFT could be an easy‐to‐use pre‐test to select which participants with bleeding disorders would benefit from extensive platelet phenotyping. Further development and evaluation of the test are warranted in a wider population of patients with excessive bleeding and could provide informative screening tests for PFDs.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis. Volume 12:Number 5(2014:May)
- Journal:
- Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis
- Issue:
- Volume 12:Number 5(2014:May)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 12, Issue 5 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 12
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0012-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 660
- Page End:
- 665
- Publication Date:
- 2014-05
- Subjects:
- Thrombosis -- Periodicals
Hemostasis -- Periodicals
Blood coagulation disorders -- Periodicals
616.1 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1538-7836 ↗
http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/jth ↗
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-thrombosis-and-haemostasis ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/jth.12555 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1538-7933
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5069.345000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3003.xml