Spatial Heterogeneity in the Response of the Proximal Femur to Two Lower‐Body Resistance Exercise Regimens. (June 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lang, Thomas F; Saeed, Isra H; Streeper, Timothy; Carballido‐Gamio, Julio; Harnish, Roy J; Frassetto, Lynda A; Lee, Stuart MC; Sibonga, Jean D; Keyak, Joyce H; Spiering, Barry A; Grodsinsky, Carlos M; Bloomberg, Jacob J; Cavanagh, Peter R
• Is Part Of: Journal of bone and mineral research. Volume 29:Number 6(2014:Jun.)
• Page Start: 1337
• Page End: 1345
• Publication Date: 2014-06
• Subjects: Bones -- Metabolism -- Periodicals; Mineral metabolism -- Periodicals; 612.392
• DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2155
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0884-0431

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>ABSTRACT</title> <sec id="jbmr2155-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <p>Understanding the skeletal effects of resistance exercise involves delineating the spatially heterogeneous response of bone to load distributions from different muscle contractions. Bone mineral density (BMD) analyses may obscure these patterns by averaging data from tissues with variable mechanoresponse. To assess the proximal femoral response to resistance exercise, we acquired pretraining and posttraining quantitative computed tomography (QCT) images in 22 subjects (25–55 years, 9 males, 13 females) performing two resistance exercises for 16 weeks. One group (SQDL, <italic>n</italic> = 7) performed 4 sets each of squats and deadlifts, a second group (ABADD, <italic>n</italic> = 8) performed 4 sets each of standing hip abductions and adductions, and a third group (COMBO, <italic>n</italic> = 7) performed two sets each of squat/deadlift and abduction/adduction exercise. Subjects exercised three times weekly, and the load was adjusted each session to maximum effort. We used voxel‐based morphometry (VBM) to visualize BMD distributions. Hip strength computations used finite element modeling (FEM) with stance and fall loading conditions. We used QCT analysis for cortical and trabecular BMD, and cortical tissue volume. For muscle size and density, we analyzed the cross‐sectional area (CSA) and mean Hounsfield unit (HU) in the hip extensor, flexor, abductor, and adductor muscle groups. Whereas SQDL increased vertebral BMD, femoral neck cortical BMD and volume, and stance hip strength, ABADD increased trochanteric cortical volume. The COMBO group showed no changes in any parameter. VBM showed different effects of ABADD and SQDL exercise, with the former causing focal changes of trochanteric cortical bone, and the latter showing diffuse changes in the femoral neck and head. ABADD exercise increased adductor CSA and HU, whereas SQDL exercise increased the hip extensor CSA and HU. In conclusion, we observed different proximal femoral bone and muscle tissue responses to SQDL and ABADD exercise. This study supports VBM and volumetric QCT (vQCT) to quantify the spatially heterogeneous effects of types of muscle contractions on bone. © 2014 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.</p> </sec> </abstract>