The use of new surface‐modified poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels in tissue engineering: Treatment of the surface with fibronectin subunits versus Ac‐CGGASIKVAVS‐OH, cysteine, and 2‐mercaptoethanol modification. Issue 7 (30th August 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The use of new surface‐modified poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels in tissue engineering: Treatment of the surface with fibronectin subunits versus Ac‐CGGASIKVAVS‐OH, cysteine, and 2‐mercaptoethanol modification. Issue 7 (30th August 2013)
- Main Title:
- The use of new surface‐modified poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels in tissue engineering: Treatment of the surface with fibronectin subunits versus Ac‐CGGASIKVAVS‐OH, cysteine, and 2‐mercaptoethanol modification
- Authors:
- Kubinová, Šárka
Horák, Daniel
Vaněček, Václav
Plichta, Zdeněk
Proks, Vladimír
Syková, Eva - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>Superporous poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate) is successfully used as a scaffold material for tissue engineering; however, it lacks functional groups that support cell adhesion. The objective of this study was to investigate the cell‐adhesive properties of biomimetic ligands, such as laminin‐derived Ac‐CGGASIKVAVS‐OH (SIKVAV) peptide and fibronectin subunits (Fn), as well as small molecules exemplified by 2‐mercaptoethanol (ME) and cysteine (Cys), immobilized on a copolymer of 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) with 2‐aminoethyl methacrylate (AEMA) by a maleimide‐thiol coupling reaction. The maleimide group was introduced to the P(HEMA‐AEMA) hydrogels by the reaction of their amino groups with <italic>N</italic>‐γ‐maleimidobutyryl‐oxysuccinimide ester (GMBS). Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were used to investigate the cell adhesive properties of the modified hydrogels. A significantly larger area of cell growth as well as a higher cell density were found on Fn‐ and SIKVAV‐modified hydrogels when compared to the ME‐ and Cys‐modified supports or neat P(HEMA‐AEMA). Moreover, Fn‐modification strongly stimulated cell proliferation. The ability of MSCs to differentiate into adipocytes and osteoblasts was maintained on both Fn‐ and SIKVAV‐modifications, but it was reduced on ME‐modified hydrogels and neat P(HEMA‐AEMA). The results show that the immobilization of SIKVAV and Fn‐subunits onto superporous P(HEMA‐AEMA) hydrogels<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>Superporous poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate) is successfully used as a scaffold material for tissue engineering; however, it lacks functional groups that support cell adhesion. The objective of this study was to investigate the cell‐adhesive properties of biomimetic ligands, such as laminin‐derived Ac‐CGGASIKVAVS‐OH (SIKVAV) peptide and fibronectin subunits (Fn), as well as small molecules exemplified by 2‐mercaptoethanol (ME) and cysteine (Cys), immobilized on a copolymer of 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) with 2‐aminoethyl methacrylate (AEMA) by a maleimide‐thiol coupling reaction. The maleimide group was introduced to the P(HEMA‐AEMA) hydrogels by the reaction of their amino groups with <italic>N</italic>‐γ‐maleimidobutyryl‐oxysuccinimide ester (GMBS). Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were used to investigate the cell adhesive properties of the modified hydrogels. A significantly larger area of cell growth as well as a higher cell density were found on Fn‐ and SIKVAV‐modified hydrogels when compared to the ME‐ and Cys‐modified supports or neat P(HEMA‐AEMA). Moreover, Fn‐modification strongly stimulated cell proliferation. The ability of MSCs to differentiate into adipocytes and osteoblasts was maintained on both Fn‐ and SIKVAV‐modifications, but it was reduced on ME‐modified hydrogels and neat P(HEMA‐AEMA). The results show that the immobilization of SIKVAV and Fn‐subunits onto superporous P(HEMA‐AEMA) hydrogels via a GMBS coupling reaction improves cell adhesive properties. The high proliferative activity observed on Fn‐modified hydrogels suggests that the immobilized Fn‐subunits maintain their bioactivity and thus represent a promising tool for application in tissue engineering. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 102A: 2315–2323, 2014.</p> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of biomedical materials research. Volume 102:Issue 7(2014:Oct.)
- Journal:
- Journal of biomedical materials research
- Issue:
- Volume 102:Issue 7(2014:Oct.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 102, Issue 7 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 102
- Issue:
- 7
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0102-0007-0000
- Page Start:
- 2315
- Page End:
- 2323
- Publication Date:
- 2013-08-30
- Subjects:
- Biomedical materials -- Periodicals
610.28 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1552-4965 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/jbm.a.34910 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1549-3296
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4953.720000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3033.xml