3D atlas-based registration can calculate malalignment of femoral shaft fractures in six degrees of freedom. (January 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Crookshank, Meghan C.; Beek, Maarten; Hardisty, Michael R.; Schemitsch, Emil H.; Whyne, Cari M.
• Is Part Of: Computer aided surgery. Volume 19:Number 1/3(2014)
• Page Start: 48
• Page End: 56
• Publication Date: 2014-01
• Subjects: Computer-assisted surgery -- Periodicals; Imaging systems in medicine -- Periodicals; Surgery, Operative -- Computer simulation -- Periodicals; Surgical technology -- Periodicals; Medical technology -- Periodicals; 617.90285
• DOI: 10.3109/10929088.2014.894126
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1092-9088

Abstract

<abstract> <title>Abstract</title> <p> <italic>Objective</italic>: This study presents and evaluates a semi-automated algorithm for quantifying malalignment in complex femoral shaft fractures from a single intraoperative cone-beam CT (CBCT) image of the fractured limb.</p> <p> <italic>Methods</italic>: CBCT images were acquired of complex comminuted diaphyseal fractures created in 9 cadaveric femora (27 cases). Scans were segmented using intensity-based thresholding, yielding image stacks of the proximal, distal and comminuted bone. Semi-deformable and rigid affine registrations to an intact femur atlas (synthetic or cadaveric-based) were performed to transform the distal fragment to its neutral alignment. Leg length was calculated from the volume of bone within the comminution fragment. The transformations were compared to the physical input malalignments.</p> <p> <italic>Results</italic>: Using the synthetic atlas, translations were within 1.71 ± 1.08 mm (medial/lateral) and 2.24 ± 2.11 mm (anterior/posterior). The varus/valgus, flexion/extension and periaxial rotation errors were 3.45 ± 2.6°, 1.86 ± 1.5° and 3.4 ± 2.0°, respectively. The cadaveric-based atlas yielded similar results in medial/lateral and anterior/posterior translation (1.73 ± 1.28 mm and 2.15 ± 2.13 mm, respectively). Varus/valgus, flexion/extension and periaxial rotation errors were 2.3 ± 1.3°, 2.0 ± 1.6° and 3.4 ± 2.0°, respectively. Leg length errors were 1.41 ± 1.01 mm (synthetic) and 1.26 ± 0.94 mm (cadaveric). The cadaveric model demonstrated a small improvement in flexion/extension and the synthetic atlas performed slightly faster (6 min 24 s ± 50 s versus 8 min 42 s ± 2 min 25 s).</p> <p> <italic>Conclusions</italic>: This atlas-based algorithm quantified malalignment in complex femoral shaft fractures within clinical tolerances from a single CBCT image of the fractured limb.</p> </abstract>