A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Incontinence‐Associated Dermatitis, Incontinence, and Moisture as Risk Factors for Pressure Ulcer Development. Issue 3 (3rd April 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Beeckman, Dimitri; Van Lancker, Aurélie; Van Hecke, Ann; Verhaeghe, Sofie
• Is Part Of: Research in nursing & health. Volume 37:Issue 3(2014:Jun.)
• Page Start: 204
• Page End: 218
• Publication Date: 2014-04-03
• Subjects: Nursing -- Research -- Periodicals; Nursing -- Periodicals; 610.7305
• DOI: 10.1002/nur.21593
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0160-6891

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="nur21593-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <p>The aim of this analysis was to identify the association between incontinence‐associated dermatitis (IAD), its most important etiologic factors (incontinence and moisture), and pressure ulcers (PUs). A systematic review and meta‐analysis were performed. We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for relevant papers dating through March 15, 2013. Fifty‐eight studies were included. Measures of relative effect at the univariate level were meta‐analyzed. In most studies (86%), a significant association between variables of interest was found, with pooled odds ratios of PUs in univariate models between 1.92 (95% <italic>CI</italic> 1.54–2.38) for urinary incontinence and 4.99 (95% <italic>CI</italic> 2.62–9.50) for double incontinence (<italic>p</italic> &lt; .05). This evidence indicates an association between IAD, its most important etiological factors, and PUs. Methodological issues should be considered when interpreting the results of this review. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p> </sec> </abstract>