Regional climate response to land surface changes after harvest in the North China Plain under present and possible future climate conditions. Issue 8 (23rd April 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cho, Mee‐Hyun; Boo, Kyung‐On; Lee, Johan; Cho, Chunho; Lim, Gyu‐Ho
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 119:Issue 8(2014:Aug.)
• Page Start: 4507
• Page End: 4520
• Publication Date: 2014-04-23
• Subjects: Atmospheric physics -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 551.5
• DOI: 10.1002/2013JD020111
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-897X

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>In this study, we investigated the impacts of land use alterations from harvesting practices on the regional surface climate over the North China Plain. The surface climate responses after harvest in June in regions where double‐cropping is practiced were evaluated using observations and model simulations with the global climate model HadGEM2‐Atmosphere. Responses were modeled under both present and possible future climate conditions. In the model, double‐cropping was represented using the monthly varying fraction of vegetation. This contributed to an improvement in the model simulation over East Asia. Modeling results showed that the land surface was warmer and drier after harvest, and these simulation results were consistent with observations. The bare soil surface after harvest in June had biophysical impacts on the surface climate that were mediated by decreasing evapotranspiration and latent heat flux effects, which increased surface air temperatures and decreased surface humidity. An increase in shortwave radiation also contributed to the rise in temperatures. Under two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) scenarios for possible future climate conditions, land conversion induced additional warming in addition to greenhouse gases induced global warming. The RCP 8.5 and RCP 2.6 scenarios demonstrated a warming of 1.0°C and 1.4°C due to harvesting practices in June, respectively. The response magnitude was affected by the climate conditions in each RCP. Our results suggest that potential impacts of harvest on the local climate need to be considered in future projections of CO<sub>2</sub>‐induced warming on a regional scale.</p> </abstract>