Area fluxes of carbon dioxide, methane, and carbon monoxide derived from airborne measurements around Greater London: A case study during summer 2012. Issue 8 (24th April 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: O'Shea, Sebastian J.; Allen, Grant; Fleming, Zoë L.; Bauguitte, Stephane J.‐B.; Percival, Carl J.; Gallagher, Martin W.; Lee, James; Helfter, Carole; Nemitz, Eiko
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 119:Issue 8(2014:Aug.)
• Page Start: 4940
• Page End: 4952
• Publication Date: 2014-04-24
• Subjects: Atmospheric physics -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 551.5
• DOI: 10.1002/2013JD021269
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-897X

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>Airborne measurements of thermodynamic properties and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), and carbon monoxide (CO) mole fractions were recorded on board the FAAM BAe‐146 UK research aircraft and used to characterize the inflow and outflow from Greater London on 30 July 2012. All three trace gases were observed to be significantly enhanced downwind of Greater London with spatially resolved plumes of comparable extent and position. A mass budget calculation using a box model approach (and uncertainty propagation) was used to determine net regional fluxes of 21 ± 3 µmol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>, 0.13 ± 0.02 µmol CH<sub>4</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>, and 0.12 ± 0.02 µmol CO m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> for Greater London. These fluxes are comparable with simultaneous surface observations and previous studies in urban environments. A comparison was made with the 2010 UK National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory (NAEI), and fluxes from this study are found to be factors 2.3 for CO<sub>2</sub> and 2.2 for CO larger than those estimated by the spatially disaggregated NAEI (2011) for Greater London. Fluxes of CH<sub>4</sub> were found to be a factor 3.4 larger than the UK NAEI (2009). The efficacy of this mass balance approach, in general, is also discussed in terms of key assumptions and uncertainties, and we offer advice for future studies on how uncertainties could be reduced.</p> </abstract>