Admittance‐based pressure–volume loops versus gold standard cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in a porcine model of myocardial infarction. Issue 4 (23rd April 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Admittance‐based pressure–volume loops versus gold standard cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in a porcine model of myocardial infarction. Issue 4 (23rd April 2014)
- Main Title:
- Admittance‐based pressure–volume loops versus gold standard cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in a porcine model of myocardial infarction
- Authors:
- van Hout, Gerardus P. J.
Jansen of Lorkeers, Sanne J.
Gho, Johannes M. I. H.
Doevendans, Pieter A.
van Solinge, Wouter W.
Pasterkamp, Gerard
Chamuleau, Steven A. J.
Hoefer, Imo E. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="phy2287-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>A novel admittance‐based pressure–volume system (AS) has recently been developed and introduced. Thus far, the new technique has been validated predominantly in small animals. In large animals it has only been compared to three‐dimensional echocardiography (3DE) where the AS showed to overestimate left ventricular (LV) volumes. To fully determine the accuracy of this device, we compared the AS with gold standard cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) in a porcine model of chronic myocardial infarction (MI). Fourteen pigs were subjected to 90 min closed chest balloon occlusion of the left anterior descending artery. After 8 weeks of follow up, pigs were consecutively subjected to LV volume measurements by the AS, CMRI, and 3DE under general anesthesia. The AS overestimated end diastolic volume (EDV; +20.9 ± 30.6 mL, <italic>P</italic> = 0.024) and end systolic volume (ESV; +17.7 ± 29.4 mL, <italic>P</italic> = 0.042) but not ejection fraction (EF; +2.46 ± 6.16%, <italic>P </italic>= NS) compared to CMRI. Good correlations of EDV (<italic>R</italic> = 0.626, <italic>P</italic> = 0.017) and EF (<italic>R</italic> = 0.704, <italic>P</italic> = 0.005) between the AS and CMRI were observed. EF measured by the AS and 3DE also correlated significantly (<italic>R</italic> = 0.624, <italic>P</italic> = 0.030). After subjection of pigs to MI, the AS very moderately overestimates LV volumes and shows<abstract abstract-type="main" id="phy2287-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>A novel admittance‐based pressure–volume system (AS) has recently been developed and introduced. Thus far, the new technique has been validated predominantly in small animals. In large animals it has only been compared to three‐dimensional echocardiography (3DE) where the AS showed to overestimate left ventricular (LV) volumes. To fully determine the accuracy of this device, we compared the AS with gold standard cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) in a porcine model of chronic myocardial infarction (MI). Fourteen pigs were subjected to 90 min closed chest balloon occlusion of the left anterior descending artery. After 8 weeks of follow up, pigs were consecutively subjected to LV volume measurements by the AS, CMRI, and 3DE under general anesthesia. The AS overestimated end diastolic volume (EDV; +20.9 ± 30.6 mL, <italic>P</italic> = 0.024) and end systolic volume (ESV; +17.7 ± 29.4 mL, <italic>P</italic> = 0.042) but not ejection fraction (EF; +2.46 ± 6.16%, <italic>P </italic>= NS) compared to CMRI. Good correlations of EDV (<italic>R</italic> = 0.626, <italic>P</italic> = 0.017) and EF (<italic>R</italic> = 0.704, <italic>P</italic> = 0.005) between the AS and CMRI were observed. EF measured by the AS and 3DE also correlated significantly (<italic>R</italic> = 0.624, <italic>P</italic> = 0.030). After subjection of pigs to MI, the AS very moderately overestimates LV volumes and shows accurate measurements for EF compared to CMRI. This makes the AS a useful tool to determine cardiac function and dynamic changes in large animal models of cardiac disease.</p> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Physiological reports. Volume 2:Issue 4(2014:Apr.)
- Journal:
- Physiological reports
- Issue:
- Volume 2:Issue 4(2014:Apr.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 2, Issue 4 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 2
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0002-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- n/a
- Page End:
- n/a
- Publication Date:
- 2014-04-23
- Subjects:
- Physiology -- Periodicals
571 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2051-817X ↗
http://physreports.physiology.org ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.14814/phy2.287 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2051-817X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4273.xml