Modulation of the Relationship Between External Knee Adduction Moments and Medial Joint Contact Forces Across Subjects and Activities. Issue 5 (May 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Trepczynski, Adam; Kutzner, Ines; Bergmann, Georg; Taylor, William R.; Heller, Markus O.
• Is Part Of: Arthritis & rheumatology. Volume 66:Issue 5(2014)
• Page Start: 1218
• Page End: 1227
• Publication Date: 2014-05
• Subjects: Arthritis -- Periodicals; Rheumatism -- Periodicals; 616.72
• DOI: 10.1002/art.38374
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2326-5191

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="art38374-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>The external knee adduction moment (EAM) is often considered a surrogate measure of the distribution of loads across the tibiofemoral joint during walking. This study was undertaken to quantify the relationship between the EAM and directly measured medial tibiofemoral contact forces (F<sub>med</sub>) in a sample of subjects across a spectrum of activities.</p> </sec> <sec id="art38374-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>The EAM for 9 patients who underwent total knee replacement was calculated using inverse dynamics analysis, while telemetric implants provided F<sub>med</sub> for multiple repetitions of 10 activities, including walking, stair negotiation, sit‐to‐stand activities, and squatting. The effects of the factors "subject" and "activity" on the relationships between F<sub>med</sub> and EAM were quantified using mixed‐effects regression analyses in terms of the root mean square error (RMSE) and the slope of the regression.</p> </sec> <sec id="art38374-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Across subjects and activities a good correlation between peak EAM and F<sub>med</sub> values was observed, with an overall R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.88. However, the slope of the linear regressions varied between subjects by up to a factor of 2. At peak EAM and F<sub>med</sub>, the RMSE of the regression across all subjects was 35% body weight (%BW), while the maximum error was 127 %BW.</p> </sec> <sec id="art38374-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>The relationship between EAM and F<sub>med</sub> is generally good but varies considerably across subjects and activities. These findings emphasize the limitation of relying solely on the EAM to infer medial joint loading when excessive directed cocontraction of muscles exists and call for further investigations into the soft tissue–related mechanisms that modulate the internal forces at the knee.</p> </sec> </abstract>