CONTACTING IS ESSENTIAL FOR OVIPOSITION DETERRENCE OF RHODOJAPONIN‐III IN SPODOPTERA LITURA. Issue 2 (29th April 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yi, Xin; Liu, Jinxiang; Wang, Peidan; Hu, Meiying; Zhong, Guohua
• Is Part Of: Archives of insect biochemistry and physiology. Volume 86:Issue 2(2014:Jun.)
• Page Start: 122
• Page End: 136
• Publication Date: 2014-04-29
• Subjects: Insects -- Physiology -- Periodicals; Insect biochemistry -- Periodicals; 595.701572
• DOI: 10.1002/arch.21170
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0739-4462

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>In Lepidoptera, choosing the right site for egg laying is particularly important, because the small larvae cannot forage for alternate host plants easily. Some secondary compounds of plants have the ability to deter oviposition behaviors of insects. Rhodojaponin‐III, a botanical compound, has been reported to have intense deterring‐oviposition activity against many insects, which have important implications for agricultural pest management. This study provided evidence for elucidating the perception mechanism underlying Rhodojaponin‐III as oviposition deterrent. In this study, the antennas of moths could not elicit notable electroantennogram responses to Rhodojaponin‐III, which suggested the Rhodojaponin‐III could not exert effects like those volatile compounds. The results of physiological experiments confirmed the Rhodojaponin‐III could produce the oviposition deterrence effect against moths without depending on antennas, while the physical contact was essential for perceiving the compound, which suggested that the sensilla on tarsus and ovipositor could be chemoreceptor for Rhodojaponin‐III. Therefore, these sensilla were investigated by scanning electron microscopy to explore their potential functions in detecting Rhodojaponin‐III. This study highlighted the contacting mechanism in deterring oviposition behaviors of moths by Rhodojaponin‐III and provided new insight for development of contact‐based pest management.</p> </abstract>