Curriculum Knowledge, Justice, Relations: The Schools White Paper (2010) in England. Issue 2 (May 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Winter, Christine
• Is Part Of: Journal of philosophy of education. Volume 48:Issue 2(2014:May)
• Page Start: 276
• Page End: 292
• Publication Date: 2014-05
• Subjects: Education -- Philosophy -- Periodicals; Education -- Great Britain -- Philosophy -- Periodicals; 370.1
• DOI: 10.1111/1467-9752.12061
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0309-8249

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>In this article I begin by discussing the persistent problem of relations between educational inequality and the attainment gap in schools. Because benefits accruing from an education are substantial, the 'gap' leads to large disparities in the quality of life many young people can expect to experience in the future. Curriculum knowledge has been a focus for debate in England in relation to educational equality for over 40 years. Given the contestation surrounding views about curriculum knowledge and equality I consider the thinking of two philosophers, Jacques Derrida and Emmanuel Levinas, and their work on justice, to trouble the curriculum framework and discourse of knowledge promoted through the policy text of <italic>The Importance of Teaching: The Schools White Paper</italic> (2010) and later associated policy reforms to the General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) curriculum in England. The Schools White Paper aims to make the curriculum more challenging to students by introducing tight controls in terms of the assessment framework and curriculum knowledge. I argue that, when considered through Derrida's perspective on language and meaning and Levinas' view on the ethical responsibility for the other, the reforms present obstacles to the search for a just curriculum. I look to the work of Sharon Todd and Paul Standish for a re‐imagination of curriculum as or through relations in the light of Derrida's and Levinas' philosophies.</p> </abstract>