Snow stratigraphic heterogeneity within ground‐based passive microwave radiometer footprints: Implications for emission modeling. Issue 3 (13th March 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rutter, Nick; Sandells, Mel; Derksen, Chris; Toose, Peter; Royer, Alain; Montpetit, Benoit; Langlois, Alex; Lemmetyinen, Juha; Pulliainen, Jouni
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 119:Issue 3(2014:Sep.)
• Page Start: 550
• Page End: 565
• Publication Date: 2014-03-13
• Subjects: Geomorphology -- Periodicals; 551.3
• DOI: 10.1002/2013JF003017
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-9003

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>Two‐dimensional measurements of snowpack properties (stratigraphic layering, density, grain size, and temperature) were used as inputs to the multilayer Helsinki University of Technology (HUT) microwave emission model at a centimeter‐scale horizontal resolution, across a 4.5 m transect of ground‐based passive microwave radiometer footprints near Churchill, Manitoba, Canada. Snowpack stratigraphy was complex (between six and eight layers) with only three layers extending continuously throughout the length of the transect. Distributions of one‐dimensional simulations, accurately representing complex stratigraphic layering, were evaluated using measured brightness temperatures. Large biases (36 to 68 K) between simulated and measured brightness temperatures were minimized (−0.5 to 0.6 K), within measurement accuracy, through application of grain scaling factors (2.6 to 5.3) at different combinations of frequencies, polarizations, and model extinction coefficients. Grain scaling factors compensated for uncertainty relating optical specific surface area to HUT effective grain size inputs and quantified relative differences in scattering and absorption properties of various extinction coefficients. The HUT model required accurate representation of ice lenses, particularly at horizontal polarization, and large grain scaling factors highlighted the need to consider microstructure beyond the size of individual grains. As variability of extinction coefficients was strongly influenced by the proportion of large (hoar) grains in a vertical profile, it is important to consider simulations from distributions of one‐dimensional profiles rather than single profiles, especially in sub‐Arctic snowpacks where stratigraphic variability can be high. Model sensitivity experiments suggested that the level of error in field measurements and the new methodological framework used to apply them in a snow emission model were satisfactory. Layer amalgamation showed that a three‐layer representation of snowpack stratigraphy reduced the bias of a one‐layer representation by about 50%.</p> </abstract>