Status of ten self‐etch adhesives for bonding to dentin of primary teeth. Issue 3 (6th August 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Status of ten self‐etch adhesives for bonding to dentin of primary teeth. Issue 3 (6th August 2013)
- Main Title:
- Status of ten self‐etch adhesives for bonding to dentin of primary teeth
- Authors:
- Krämer, Norbert
Tilch, David
Lücker, Susanne
Frankenberger, Roland - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="ipd12059-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="ipd12059-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>Aim of this <italic>in vitro</italic> study was to compare self‐etch adhesives regarding microtensile bond strength (μ‐TBS) to dentin of primary teeth.</p> </sec> <sec id="ipd12059-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Fifty freshly extracted primary molars were ground to expose caries‐free dentin. Specimens were bonded with ten self‐etch adhesives (iBond self‐etch/Heraeus, Xeno V+/Dentsply, G‐Bond, Gaenial Bond/GC, BeautiBond/Shofu, AdheSE One F/Ivoclar Vivadent, Adper Easy Bond/3M ESPE, Clearfil SE Bond/Kuraray, OptiBond XTR/KerrHawe, Prime&amp;Bond NT/Dentsply). After 24‐h storage (distilled water, 37°C), resin–dentin beams were cut and 848 resin–dentin sticks were subjected to μ‐TBS tests. Fracture analysis was carried out at 40× magnification under a fluorescence microscope and under a SEM.</p> </sec> <sec id="ipd12059-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Three adhesives (iBond SE, Clearfil SE Bond, Prime&amp;Bond NT) did not suffer pre‐test failures (PTF). AdheSE One F revealed the largest portion of PTF (28%; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). Clearfil SE Bond and OptiBond XTR exhibited more cohesive fractures than the other adhesives (77.3% <italic>vs</italic> 64.8%; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). iBond SE, Gaenial Bond, Clearfil SE, and OptiBond XTR<abstract abstract-type="main" id="ipd12059-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="ipd12059-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>Aim of this <italic>in vitro</italic> study was to compare self‐etch adhesives regarding microtensile bond strength (μ‐TBS) to dentin of primary teeth.</p> </sec> <sec id="ipd12059-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Fifty freshly extracted primary molars were ground to expose caries‐free dentin. Specimens were bonded with ten self‐etch adhesives (iBond self‐etch/Heraeus, Xeno V+/Dentsply, G‐Bond, Gaenial Bond/GC, BeautiBond/Shofu, AdheSE One F/Ivoclar Vivadent, Adper Easy Bond/3M ESPE, Clearfil SE Bond/Kuraray, OptiBond XTR/KerrHawe, Prime&amp;Bond NT/Dentsply). After 24‐h storage (distilled water, 37°C), resin–dentin beams were cut and 848 resin–dentin sticks were subjected to μ‐TBS tests. Fracture analysis was carried out at 40× magnification under a fluorescence microscope and under a SEM.</p> </sec> <sec id="ipd12059-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Three adhesives (iBond SE, Clearfil SE Bond, Prime&amp;Bond NT) did not suffer pre‐test failures (PTF). AdheSE One F revealed the largest portion of PTF (28%; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). Clearfil SE Bond and OptiBond XTR exhibited more cohesive fractures than the other adhesives (77.3% <italic>vs</italic> 64.8%; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). iBond SE, Gaenial Bond, Clearfil SE, and OptiBond XTR achieved μ‐TBS of &gt;60 MPa, whereas Xeno V+ and AdheSE One F ranged only at ~20 MPa (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05).</p> </sec> <sec id="ipd12059-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>Within the limits of this study, the self‐etch adhesives under investigation proved different extents of initial μ‐TBS to primary dentin with iBond SE, Gaenial Bond, Clearfil SE, and OptiBond XTR having been most successful.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of paediatric dentistry. Volume 24:Issue 3(2014:May)
- Journal:
- International journal of paediatric dentistry
- Issue:
- Volume 24:Issue 3(2014:May)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 24, Issue 3 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 24
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0024-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 192
- Page End:
- 199
- Publication Date:
- 2013-08-06
- Subjects:
- Pedodontics -- Periodicals
617.645 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=ipd ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-263X ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/ipd.12059 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0960-7439
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.440800
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3025.xml