Array‐comparative genomic hybridization profiling of immunohistochemical subgroups of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma shows distinct genomic alterations. Issue 4 (24th March 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Array‐comparative genomic hybridization profiling of immunohistochemical subgroups of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma shows distinct genomic alterations. Issue 4 (24th March 2014)
- Main Title:
- Array‐comparative genomic hybridization profiling of immunohistochemical subgroups of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma shows distinct genomic alterations
- Authors:
- Guo, Ying
Takeuchi, Ichiro
Karnan, Sivasundaram
Miyata, Tomoko
Ohshima, Koichi
Seto, Masao - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="cas12378-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) displays striking heterogeneity at the clinical, genetic and molecular levels. Subtypes include germinal center B‐cell‐like (GCB) DLBCL and activated B‐cell‐like (ABC) DLBCL, according to microarray analysis, and germinal center type or non‐germinal center type by immunohistochemistry. Although some reports have described genomic aberrations based upon microarray classification system, genomic aberrations based upon immunohistochemical classifications have rarely been reported. The present study aimed to ascertain the relationship between genomic aberrations and subtypes identified by immunohistochemistry, and to study the pathogenetic character of Chinese DLBCL. We conducted immunohistochemistry using antibodies against CD10, BCL6 and MUM1 in 59 samples of DLBCL from Chinese patients, and then performed microarray‐based comparative genomic hybridization for each case. Characteristic genomic differences were found between GCB and non‐GCB DLBCL from the array data. The GCB type was characterized by more gains at 7q (7q22.1, <italic>P </italic>&lt; 0.05) and losses at 16q (<italic>P </italic>≤ 0.05), while the non‐GCB type was characterized by gains at 11q24.3 and 3q13.2 (<italic>P </italic>&lt; 0.05). We found completely different mutations in BCL6+ and BCL6− non‐GCB type DLBCL, whereby the BCL6− group had a higher number of<abstract abstract-type="main" id="cas12378-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) displays striking heterogeneity at the clinical, genetic and molecular levels. Subtypes include germinal center B‐cell‐like (GCB) DLBCL and activated B‐cell‐like (ABC) DLBCL, according to microarray analysis, and germinal center type or non‐germinal center type by immunohistochemistry. Although some reports have described genomic aberrations based upon microarray classification system, genomic aberrations based upon immunohistochemical classifications have rarely been reported. The present study aimed to ascertain the relationship between genomic aberrations and subtypes identified by immunohistochemistry, and to study the pathogenetic character of Chinese DLBCL. We conducted immunohistochemistry using antibodies against CD10, BCL6 and MUM1 in 59 samples of DLBCL from Chinese patients, and then performed microarray‐based comparative genomic hybridization for each case. Characteristic genomic differences were found between GCB and non‐GCB DLBCL from the array data. The GCB type was characterized by more gains at 7q (7q22.1, <italic>P </italic>&lt; 0.05) and losses at 16q (<italic>P </italic>≤ 0.05), while the non‐GCB type was characterized by gains at 11q24.3 and 3q13.2 (<italic>P </italic>&lt; 0.05). We found completely different mutations in BCL6+ and BCL6− non‐GCB type DLBCL, whereby the BCL6− group had a higher number of gains at 1q and a loss at 14q32.13 (<italic>P </italic>≤ 0.005), while the BCL6+ group showed a higher number of gains at 14q23.1 (<italic>P </italic>= 0.15) and losses at 6q (<italic>P </italic>= 0.07). The BCL6− group had a higher frequency of genomic imbalances compared to the BCL6+ group. In conclusion, the BCL6+ and BCL6− non‐GCB type of DLBCL appear to have different mechanisms of pathogenesis.</p> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Cancer science. Volume 105:Issue 4(2014:Apr.)
- Journal:
- Cancer science
- Issue:
- Volume 105:Issue 4(2014:Apr.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 105, Issue 4 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 105
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0105-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 481
- Page End:
- 489
- Publication Date:
- 2014-03-24
- Subjects:
- Cancer -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Research -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
616.994005 - Journal URLs:
- http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=1347-9032;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1349-7006 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/cas.12378 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1347-9032
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3046.603000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4322.xml