Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of stapled and manual coloanal anastomosis. (May 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of stapled and manual coloanal anastomosis. (May 2014)
- Main Title:
- Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of stapled and manual coloanal anastomosis
- Authors:
- Cong, J. C.
Chen, C. S.
Ma, M. X.
Xia, Z. X.
Liu, D. S.
Zhang, F. Y. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="codi12573-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="codi12573-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Aim</title> <p>The study aim was to analyse the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection with stapled coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer.</p> </sec> <sec id="codi12573-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Method</title> <p>Between March 2009 and August 2010, 22 patients underwent laparoscopic intersphincteric resection with a stapled coloanal anastomosis without a diverting ileostomy. The results were compared retrospectively with hand‐sewn coloanal anastomoses performed between January 2001 and May 2009, which included 55 open and 38 laparoscopic intersphincteric resections. The morbidity comparison only included data relevant to the anastomosis. Function was compared using the Saito function questionnaire and the Wexner score and only involved data relevant to the laparoscopy.</p> </sec> <sec id="codi12573-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>The anastomotic complication rates were similar for fistula, bleeding and neorectal mucosal prolapse (<italic>P </italic>=<italic> </italic>0.526, <italic>P </italic>=<italic> </italic>0.653 and <italic>P </italic>=<italic> </italic>0.411, respectively). Anastomotic leakage and stricture formation of the stapled coloanal anastomosis were significantly lower than those of the hand‐sewn coloanal anastomosis (<italic>P </italic>=<italic> </italic>0.037<abstract abstract-type="main" id="codi12573-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="codi12573-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Aim</title> <p>The study aim was to analyse the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection with stapled coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer.</p> </sec> <sec id="codi12573-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Method</title> <p>Between March 2009 and August 2010, 22 patients underwent laparoscopic intersphincteric resection with a stapled coloanal anastomosis without a diverting ileostomy. The results were compared retrospectively with hand‐sewn coloanal anastomoses performed between January 2001 and May 2009, which included 55 open and 38 laparoscopic intersphincteric resections. The morbidity comparison only included data relevant to the anastomosis. Function was compared using the Saito function questionnaire and the Wexner score and only involved data relevant to the laparoscopy.</p> </sec> <sec id="codi12573-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>The anastomotic complication rates were similar for fistula, bleeding and neorectal mucosal prolapse (<italic>P </italic>=<italic> </italic>0.526, <italic>P </italic>=<italic> </italic>0.653 and <italic>P </italic>=<italic> </italic>0.411, respectively). Anastomotic leakage and stricture formation of the stapled coloanal anastomosis were significantly lower than those of the hand‐sewn coloanal anastomosis (<italic>P </italic>=<italic> </italic>0.037 and <italic>P </italic>=<italic> </italic>0.028, respectively). There were no significant differences in the Saito function questionnaire and the Wexner score between the stapled and hand‐sewn coloanal anastomotic groups (all <italic>P </italic>&gt;<italic> </italic>0.05).</p> </sec> <sec id="codi12573-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection with a stapled coloanal anastomosis is technically feasible and is less likely to result in anastomotic leakage and stricture formation than a hand‐sewn anastomosis.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Colorectal disease. Volume 16:Number 5(2014)
- Journal:
- Colorectal disease
- Issue:
- Volume 16:Number 5(2014)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 16, Issue 5 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 16
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0016-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 353
- Page End:
- 358
- Publication Date:
- 2014-05
- Subjects:
- Colon (Anatomy) -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Rectum -- Diseases -- Periodicals
616.34 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=cdi ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/codi.12573 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1462-8910
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3322.110000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4013.xml