Efficacy and Safety of Carisbamate in Patients with Diabetic Neuropathy or Postherpetic Neuralgia: Results from 3 Randomized, Double‐Blind Placebo‐Controlled Trials. Issue 4 (22nd May 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Efficacy and Safety of Carisbamate in Patients with Diabetic Neuropathy or Postherpetic Neuralgia: Results from 3 Randomized, Double‐Blind Placebo‐Controlled Trials. Issue 4 (22nd May 2013)
- Main Title:
- Efficacy and Safety of Carisbamate in Patients with Diabetic Neuropathy or Postherpetic Neuralgia: Results from 3 Randomized, Double‐Blind Placebo‐Controlled Trials
- Authors:
- Smith, Timothy
DiBernardo, Allitia
Shi, Yingqi
Todd, Mike J.
Brashear, H. Robert
Ford, Lisa M. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en" id="papr12080-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>The results of 3 proof‐of‐concept studies to evaluate carisbamate's efficacy and safety in treating neuropathic pain are presented. In studies 1 (postherpetic neuralgia, <italic>n</italic> = 91) and 2 (diabetic neuropathy, <italic>n</italic> = 137), patients received carisbamate 400 mg/day or placebo for 4 weeks and then crossed over to the other treatment for 4 weeks. In study 3 (diabetic neuropathy, higher carisbamate doses), patients (<italic>n</italic> = 386) were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive either carisbamate 800 mg/day, 1200 mg/day, pregabalin 300 mg/day or placebo for 15 weeks. Primary efficacy end point was the mean of the last 7 average daily pain scores obtained on days the study drug was taken, for all 3 studies. Least square mean (95% CI) differences between carisbamate and placebo groups on the primary end point were as follows: study 1: −0.512 (−1.32, 0.29) carisbamate 400 mg/day; study 2: −0.307 (−0.94, 0.33) carisbamate 400 mg/day; and study 3: −0.51 (−1.10, 0.08), carisbamate 800 mg/day; −0.55 (−1.13, 0.04), carisbamate 1200 mg/day; and −0.43 (−1.01, 0.15), pregabalin 300 mg/day. Neither carisbamate (all 3 studies) nor pregabalin (study 3) significantly differed from placebo, although multiple secondary end points showed significant improvement in efficacy with carisbamate in studies 1 and 2. Dizziness was the only treatment‐emergent adverse event occurring<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en" id="papr12080-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>The results of 3 proof‐of‐concept studies to evaluate carisbamate's efficacy and safety in treating neuropathic pain are presented. In studies 1 (postherpetic neuralgia, <italic>n</italic> = 91) and 2 (diabetic neuropathy, <italic>n</italic> = 137), patients received carisbamate 400 mg/day or placebo for 4 weeks and then crossed over to the other treatment for 4 weeks. In study 3 (diabetic neuropathy, higher carisbamate doses), patients (<italic>n</italic> = 386) were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive either carisbamate 800 mg/day, 1200 mg/day, pregabalin 300 mg/day or placebo for 15 weeks. Primary efficacy end point was the mean of the last 7 average daily pain scores obtained on days the study drug was taken, for all 3 studies. Least square mean (95% CI) differences between carisbamate and placebo groups on the primary end point were as follows: study 1: −0.512 (−1.32, 0.29) carisbamate 400 mg/day; study 2: −0.307 (−0.94, 0.33) carisbamate 400 mg/day; and study 3: −0.51 (−1.10, 0.08), carisbamate 800 mg/day; −0.55 (−1.13, 0.04), carisbamate 1200 mg/day; and −0.43 (−1.01, 0.15), pregabalin 300 mg/day. Neither carisbamate (all 3 studies) nor pregabalin (study 3) significantly differed from placebo, although multiple secondary end points showed significant improvement in efficacy with carisbamate in studies 1 and 2. Dizziness was the only treatment‐emergent adverse event occurring at ≥10% difference in carisbamate groups versus placebo (study 1: 12% vs. 1%; study 3: 14% vs. 4%; study 2: 1% vs. 2%). Carisbamate, although well tolerated, did not demonstrate efficacy in neuropathic pain across these studies, nor did the active comparator pregabalin (study 3).</p> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Pain practice. Volume 14:Issue 4(2014)
- Journal:
- Pain practice
- Issue:
- Volume 14:Issue 4(2014)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 14, Issue 4 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 14
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0014-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 332
- Page End:
- 342
- Publication Date:
- 2013-05-22
- Subjects:
- Pain -- Treatment -- Periodicals
616.0472 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/%28ISSN%291533-2500 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=ppr ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=1530-7085;screen=info;ECOIP ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/papr.12080 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1530-7085
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6333.807500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4010.xml