Efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy for allergic asthma: retrospective meta‐analysis of randomized, double‐blind and placebo‐controlled trials. (5th March 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tao, Lianqin; Shi, Baoyu; Shi, Guochao; Wan, Huanying
• Is Part Of: Clinical respiratory journal. Volume 8:Number 2(2014)
• Page Start: 192
• Page End: 205
• Publication Date: 2014-03-05
• Subjects: Respiratory organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Respiratory organs -- Periodicals; 616.24
• DOI: 10.1111/crj.12058
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1752-6981

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="crj12058-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Allergen‐specific immunotherapy (SIT) is the only available curative choice with a disease‐modifying effect against respiratory allergies. The efficacy of SIT via the sublingual route was demonstrated by a number of clinical trials. This meta‐analysis was performed to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of sublingual‐specific immunotherapy (SLIT) for allergic asthma.</p> </sec> <sec id="crj12058-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for randomized, double‐blind and placebo‐controlled (DBPC) trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of SLIT on allergic asthma. Subgroup analyses were performed according to age, type of allergen and duration of SLIT treatment.</p> </sec> <sec id="crj12058-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Sixteen randomized DBPC trials comprising 794 patients in total met the inclusion criteria. The results suggest that SLIT significantly reduces both symptom [standardized mean difference (SMD), −0.74; <italic>P</italic> = 0.006] and medication scores (SMD, −0.78; <italic>P</italic> = 0.02) compared with placebo. SLIT offers a better clinical response in mite sensitive asthmatics but without confirmed proof from subgroup analyses. Prolonged duration of treatment for more than 12 months brings no additive effects. Improvement in the skin prick test was also observed following immunotherapy. There was no consistent effect on forced expiratory volume in 1 s, serum levels of antigen‐specific immunoglobulin G4 and immunoglobulin E in the treated group. The risk of adverse effects was relative risk 2.23 (<italic>P</italic> = 0.01).</p> </sec> <sec id="crj12058-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>SLIT is safe and clinically effective in reducing symptoms and medication use for allergic asthma. Our subgroup analyses failed to identify a disproportionate benefit of SLIT in any specific group of asthmatics, but some possible trends did emerge.</p> </sec> </abstract>