Emergencies in radiology: A survey of radiologists and radiology trainees. Issue 2 (7th October 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Craig, Simon; Naidoo, Parmanand
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology. Volume 58:Issue 2(2014:Apr.)
• Page Start: 164
• Page End: 171
• Publication Date: 2013-10-07
• Subjects: Radiology, Medical -- Periodicals; Radiology, Medical -- Australasia -- Periodicals; 616.0757
• DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12125
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1754-9477

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jmiro12125-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Introduction</title> <p>Emergencies in radiology are infrequent but potentially lethal. Australian and New Zealand radiologists are advised to undergo resuscitation training at least every three years; however, little is known about their experience and confidence in managing common emergencies relevant to their clinical practice. This paper describes the current experience and confidence of radiologists and radiology trainees in Australia and New Zealand in the management of common medical emergencies.</p> </sec> <sec id="jmiro12125-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>A cross‐sectional online survey of trainees and fellows of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiology collected data on training and learning preferences relating to resuscitation and life‐support skills, access to emergency medical care, and knowledge, confidence and ability in managing a variety of medical emergencies.</p> </sec> <sec id="jmiro12125-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>There were 602 responses to the survey (response rate 23.4%). The majority of respondents were interested in learning more about the management of contrast reactions, cardiac arrest, ischaemic chest pain and basic life support. Self‐rated knowledge, confidence and ability were higher in respondents who had completed life‐support training within the previous three years. In this group, however, more than 40% rated their ability at managing contrast reactions as poor or fair, while more than 60% rated their ability as poor or fair for management of cardiac arrest, basic life support, advanced life support and dosing of adrenaline. Preferred resuscitation training modalities included simulation, small‐group tutorials and workshops.</p> </sec> <sec id="jmiro12125-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>Self‐reported level of skill and expertise in the management of potential emergencies in radiology is suboptimal among a large number of respondents. Consideration should be given to addressing this by improving access to specific training.</p> </sec> </abstract>