Nonadministration of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with HIV: A missed opportunity for prevention?. Issue 4 (24th January 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Nonadministration of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with HIV: A missed opportunity for prevention?. Issue 4 (24th January 2014)
- Main Title:
- Nonadministration of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with HIV: A missed opportunity for prevention?
- Authors:
- Newman, Matthew J.
Kraus, Peggy S.
Shermock, Kenneth M.
Lau, Brandyn D.
Haut, Elliott R.
Hobson, Deborah B.
Streiff, Michael B. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="jhm2156-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>BACKGROUND</title> <p>Hospitalized patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) appear to be at increased risk of venous thromboembolism. Previous work at our institution has demonstrated that the proportion of doses administered varies between patients and locations.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2156-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> <p>To compare the proportion of doses of thromboprophylaxis not administered between patients with and without HIV.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2156-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>DESIGN</title> <p>Using retrospective data, the proportion of nonadministered doses was determined in all hospitalized adults and stratified by HIV status.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2156-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>SETTING</title> <p>Large, urban, academic medical center in Baltimore, Maryland.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2156-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>PATIENTS</title> <p>Data were available for 4947 patient visits, 583 of which were by patients with HIV. Most visits by patients with HIV were to a designated HIV care unit.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2156-sec-0006" sec-type="section"> <title>MEASUREMENTS</title> <p>Proportion of doses of thromboprophylaxis not administered, and documented reasons for dose nonadministration.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2156-sec-0007" sec-type="section"> <title>RESULTS</title><abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="jhm2156-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>BACKGROUND</title> <p>Hospitalized patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) appear to be at increased risk of venous thromboembolism. Previous work at our institution has demonstrated that the proportion of doses administered varies between patients and locations.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2156-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> <p>To compare the proportion of doses of thromboprophylaxis not administered between patients with and without HIV.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2156-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>DESIGN</title> <p>Using retrospective data, the proportion of nonadministered doses was determined in all hospitalized adults and stratified by HIV status.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2156-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>SETTING</title> <p>Large, urban, academic medical center in Baltimore, Maryland.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2156-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>PATIENTS</title> <p>Data were available for 4947 patient visits, 583 of which were by patients with HIV. Most visits by patients with HIV were to a designated HIV care unit.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2156-sec-0006" sec-type="section"> <title>MEASUREMENTS</title> <p>Proportion of doses of thromboprophylaxis not administered, and documented reasons for dose nonadministration.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2156-sec-0007" sec-type="section"> <title>RESULTS</title> <p>A total of 42, 870 doses were prescribed. The proportion of doses not administered was greater for patients with HIV (23.5%) compared with patients without HIV (16.1%, odds ratio [OR]: 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.49‐1.70, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001). Documented dose refusal accounted for a greater proportion of nonadministered doses in patients with HIV (15.9% vs 10.8%, OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.43‐1.70, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.0001). On the HIV care unit, the proportion of doses not administered was greater for patients with HIV (26.4% vs 13.1%, OR: 2.39, 95% CI: 1.93‐2.96, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001). Within this unit, documented dose refusal was greater for patients with HIV (13.7% vs 10.7%, OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.16‐1.51, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.0001).</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2156-sec-0008" sec-type="section"> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> <p>Nonadministration and documented refusal of thromboprophylaxis appear to be more common in patients with HIV at our institution. <italic>Journal of Hospital Medicine</italic> 2014;9:215–220. © 2014 Society of Hospital Medicine</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of hospital medicine. Volume 9:Issue 4(2014)
- Journal:
- Journal of hospital medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 9:Issue 4(2014)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 9, Issue 4 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 9
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0009-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 215
- Page End:
- 220
- Publication Date:
- 2014-01-24
- Subjects:
- Hospital care -- Periodicals
Clinical medicine -- Periodicals
610 - Journal URLs:
- http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jtoc/111081937 ↗
https://www.journalofhospitalmedicine.com/jhospmed/issues ↗
https://shmpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15535606 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/jhm.2156 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1553-5592
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5003.298000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3435.xml