Patient, hospital, and geographic disparities associated with comanagement during hospitalization for colorectal cancer surgery. Issue 4 (3rd February 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Patient, hospital, and geographic disparities associated with comanagement during hospitalization for colorectal cancer surgery. Issue 4 (3rd February 2014)
- Main Title:
- Patient, hospital, and geographic disparities associated with comanagement during hospitalization for colorectal cancer surgery
- Authors:
- de Vries, Simone
Jeffe, Donna B.
Pruitt, Sandi L.
Davidson, Nicholas O.
Schootman, Mario - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="jhm2161-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>BACKGROUND</title> <p>Comanagement of surgical patients has increased, but information regarding detailed characteristics of patients receiving comanagement during hospitalization for colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery is lacking.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2161-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> <p>To examine the use of and characteristics associated with comanagement of patients hospitalized for CRC surgery.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2161-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>DESIGN</title> <p>This study used a population‐based cross‐sectional design.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2161-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>SETTING</title> <p>We used the linked 2000 to 2005 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare claims data.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2161-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>PATIENTS</title> <p>We included 37, 065 patients aged 66 years or older, hospitalized for definitive CRC surgery following stage I to III diagnosis.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2161-sec-0006" sec-type="section"> <title>MEASUREMENTS</title> <p>The outcome of interest was comanagement during hospitalization for CRC surgery, and we examined the association between several patient and hospital characteristics. Comanagement was defined as having a relevant physician (ie, internal medicine hospitalist/generalist) submit a claim for evaluation<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="jhm2161-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>BACKGROUND</title> <p>Comanagement of surgical patients has increased, but information regarding detailed characteristics of patients receiving comanagement during hospitalization for colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery is lacking.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2161-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> <p>To examine the use of and characteristics associated with comanagement of patients hospitalized for CRC surgery.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2161-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>DESIGN</title> <p>This study used a population‐based cross‐sectional design.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2161-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>SETTING</title> <p>We used the linked 2000 to 2005 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare claims data.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2161-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>PATIENTS</title> <p>We included 37, 065 patients aged 66 years or older, hospitalized for definitive CRC surgery following stage I to III diagnosis.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2161-sec-0006" sec-type="section"> <title>MEASUREMENTS</title> <p>The outcome of interest was comanagement during hospitalization for CRC surgery, and we examined the association between several patient and hospital characteristics. Comanagement was defined as having a relevant physician (ie, internal medicine hospitalist/generalist) submit a claim for evaluation and management services on 70% or more of the days of hospitalization of the patient.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2161-sec-0007" sec-type="section"> <title>RESULTS</title> <p>During hospitalization for CRC surgery, 27.6% of patients were comanaged, but this percentage varied widely across hospitals (from 1.9% to 83.2%). Several patient and hospital characteristics were associated with the use of comanaged care, of which important characteristics included older age at diagnosis, presence of comorbidity, emergency surgery, and hospital volume.</p> </sec> <sec id="jhm2161-sec-0008" sec-type="section"> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> <p>Extensive variability existed in comanagement use across patients and hospitals, likely reflecting the lack of evidence for its clinical effectiveness. <italic>Journal of Hospital Medicine</italic> 2014;9:226–231. © 2014 Society of Hospital Medicine</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of hospital medicine. Volume 9:Issue 4(2014)
- Journal:
- Journal of hospital medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 9:Issue 4(2014)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 9, Issue 4 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 9
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0009-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 226
- Page End:
- 231
- Publication Date:
- 2014-02-03
- Subjects:
- Hospital care -- Periodicals
Clinical medicine -- Periodicals
610 - Journal URLs:
- http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jtoc/111081937 ↗
https://www.journalofhospitalmedicine.com/jhospmed/issues ↗
https://shmpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15535606 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/jhm.2161 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1553-5592
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5003.298000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3435.xml