Does God Exist in Methodological Atheism? On Tanya Lurhmann's When God Talks Back and Bruno Latour1. (March 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bialecki, Jon
• Is Part Of: Anthropology of consciousness. Volume 25:Number 1(2014:May)
• Page Start: 32
• Page End: 52
• Publication Date: 2014-03
• Subjects: Consciousness -- Periodicals; Anthropology -- Periodicals; 128
• DOI: 10.1111/anoc.12017
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1053-4202

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="anoc12017-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>In the anthropology of Christianity, and more broadly in the anthropology of religion, methodological atheism has foreclosed ethnographic description of God as a social actor. This prohibition is the product of certain ontological presumptions regarding agency, an absence of autonomy of human creations, and a truncated conception of what can be said to exist. Reading Tanya Luhrmann's recent ethnography, When God Talks Back: Understanding the American Evangelical Relationship with God (2012), in light of both the ontological postulates of Object Orientated Ontology and the work of Bruno Latour, this article proposes an ontological framework that makes it is possible to ethnographically describe God as a social actor without adopting methodological theism. This article also notes, however, that the ethnographic description of religious practice, found in studies of the Vineyard denomination such as Luhrmann's, challenge Latour's own account of the difference between science and religions as distinguishable enterprises.</p> </abstract>