El Mayor‐Cucapah (Mw 7.2) earthquake: Early near‐field postseismic deformation from InSAR and GPS observations. Issue 2 (24th February 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gonzalez‐Ortega, Alejandro; Fialko, Yuri; Sandwell, David; Alejandro Nava‐Pichardo, F.; Fletcher, John; Gonzalez‐Garcia, Javier; Lipovsky, Brad; Floyd, Michael; Funning, Gareth
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 119:Issue 2(2014:Feb.)
• Page Start: 1482
• Page End: 1497
• Publication Date: 2014-02-24
• Subjects: Geomagnetism -- Periodicals; Geochemistry -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; Earth sciences -- Periodicals; 551.1
• DOI: 10.1002/2013JB010193
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-9313

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>El Mayor‐Cucapah earthquake occurred on 4 April 2010 in northeastern Baja California just south of the U.S.‐Mexico border. The earthquake ruptured several previously mapped faults, as well as some unidentified ones, including the Pescadores, Borrego, Paso Inferior and Paso Superior faults in the Sierra Cucapah, and the Indiviso fault in the Mexicali Valley and Colorado River Delta. We conducted several Global Positioning System (GPS) campaign surveys of preexisting and newly established benchmarks within 30 km of the earthquake rupture. Most of the benchmarks were occupied within days after the earthquake, allowing us to capture the very early postseismic transient motions. The GPS data show postseismic displacements in the same direction as the coseismic displacements; time series indicate a gradual decay in postseismic velocities with characteristic time scales of 66 ± 9 days and 20 ± 3 days, assuming exponential and logarithmic decay, respectively. We also analyzed interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) data from the Envisat and ALOS satellites. The main deformation features seen in the line‐of‐sight displacement maps indicate subsidence concentrated in the southern and northern parts of the main rupture, in particular at the Indiviso fault, at the Laguna Salada basin, and at the Paso Superior fault. We show that the near‐field GPS and InSAR observations over a time period of 5 months after the earthquake can be explained by a combination of afterslip, fault zone contraction, and a possible minor contribution of poroelastic rebound. Far‐field data require an additional mechanism, most likely viscoelastic relaxation in the ductile substrate.</p> </abstract>