Prevalence of Chronic Pain, Impact on Daily Life, and Treatment Practices in India. Issue 2 (4th December 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Prevalence of Chronic Pain, Impact on Daily Life, and Treatment Practices in India. Issue 2 (4th December 2013)
- Main Title:
- Prevalence of Chronic Pain, Impact on Daily Life, and Treatment Practices in India
- Authors:
- Dureja, Gur Prasad
Jain, Paramanand N.
Shetty, Naresh
Mandal, Shyama Prasad
Prabhoo, Ram
Joshi, Muralidhar
Goswami, Subrata
Natarajan, Karthic Babu
Iyer, Rajagopalan
Tanna, D. D.
Ghosh, Pahari
Saxena, Ashok
Kadhe, Ganesh
Phansalkar, Abhay A. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="papr12132-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="papr12132-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>Chronic pain is of concern to health professionals, patients, society, and negatively impacts quality of life (QoL). The present epidemiologic study identified point prevalence of chronic pain in India, impact on individual's QoL, unveiling current pain treatment practices, and levels of satisfaction with treatment.</p> </sec> <sec id="papr12132-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>This epidemiological telephonic survey consisted of two questionnaires: screening questionnaire that assessed prevalence of pain, its frequency during the past week, intensity during last episode, sites of pain, and main causes, and in‐depth questionnaire that evaluated demography, frequency, duration, and intensity of pain; impact of pain on QoL; respondent's perception regarding the attitude of their family, friends, and doctors toward their pain.</p> </sec> <sec id="papr12132-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>A total of 5004 respondents were included from eight cities across India. The overall point prevalence of chronic pain was 13%, and the mean intensity of pain on NRS scale was 6.93. Respondents with chronic moderate and chronic severe pain were 37% and 63%, respectively. Pain in knees (32%), legs (28%), and joints (22%) was most prevalent. Respondents with chronic pain were no longer able to<abstract abstract-type="main" id="papr12132-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="papr12132-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>Chronic pain is of concern to health professionals, patients, society, and negatively impacts quality of life (QoL). The present epidemiologic study identified point prevalence of chronic pain in India, impact on individual's QoL, unveiling current pain treatment practices, and levels of satisfaction with treatment.</p> </sec> <sec id="papr12132-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>This epidemiological telephonic survey consisted of two questionnaires: screening questionnaire that assessed prevalence of pain, its frequency during the past week, intensity during last episode, sites of pain, and main causes, and in‐depth questionnaire that evaluated demography, frequency, duration, and intensity of pain; impact of pain on QoL; respondent's perception regarding the attitude of their family, friends, and doctors toward their pain.</p> </sec> <sec id="papr12132-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>A total of 5004 respondents were included from eight cities across India. The overall point prevalence of chronic pain was 13%, and the mean intensity of pain on NRS scale was 6.93. Respondents with chronic moderate and chronic severe pain were 37% and 63%, respectively. Pain in knees (32%), legs (28%), and joints (22%) was most prevalent. Respondents with chronic pain were no longer able to exercise, sleep, maintain relationships with friends and family, and maintain an independent lifestyle. About 32% of patients lost ≥4 hours of work in the past 3 months. Majority (68%) of respondents were treated for pain with over the counter (OTC) drugs, and most were taking NSAIDs (95%).</p> </sec> <sec id="papr12132-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>A significant population of India suffers from chronic pain, and their QoL is affected leading to disability. A proportion of respondents receiving pain treatment were taking nonprescription medications with a majority of respondents on NSAIDs. A very few were consulting pain management specialists.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Pain practice. Volume 14:Issue 2(2014)
- Journal:
- Pain practice
- Issue:
- Volume 14:Issue 2(2014)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 14, Issue 2 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 14
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0014-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- E51
- Page End:
- E62
- Publication Date:
- 2013-12-04
- Subjects:
- Pain -- Treatment -- Periodicals
616.0472 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/%28ISSN%291533-2500 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=ppr ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=1530-7085;screen=info;ECOIP ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/papr.12132 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1530-7085
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6333.807500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3477.xml