Quantifying esophagogastric junction contractility with a novel HRM topographic metric, the EGJ‐Contractile Integral: normative values and preliminary evaluation in PPI non‐responders. Issue 3 (3rd December 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nicodème, F.; Pipa‐Muniz, M.; Khanna, K.; Kahrilas, P. J.; Pandolfino, J. E.
• Is Part Of: Neurogastroenterology & motility. Volume 26:Issue 3(2014:Mar.)
• Page Start: 353
• Page End: 360
• Publication Date: 2013-12-03
• Subjects: Gastrointestinal system -- Motility -- Periodicals; Gastrointestinal system -- Innervation -- Periodicals; 616.33
• DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12267
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1350-1925

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="nmo12267-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="nmo12267-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Despite its obvious pathophysiological relevance, the clinical utility of measures of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) contractility is unsubstantiated. High‐resolution manometry (HRM) may improve upon this with its inherent ability to integrate the magnitude of contractility over time and length of the EGJ. This study aimed to develop a novel HRM metric summarizing EGJ contractility and test its ability distinguish among subgroups of proton pump inhibitor non‐responders (PPI‐NRs).</p> </sec> <sec id="nmo12267-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>75 normal controls and 88 PPI‐NRs were studied. All underwent HRM. PPI‐NRs underwent pH‐impedance monitoring on PPI therapy scored in terms of acid exposure, number of reflux events, and reflux‐symptom correlation and grouped as meeting all criteria, some criteria, or no criteria of abnormality. Control HRM studies were used to establish normal values for candidate EGJ contractility metrics, which were then compared in their ability to differentiate among PPI‐NR subgroups.</p> </sec> <sec id="nmo12267-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Key Results</title> <p>The EGJ contractile integral (EGJ‐CI), a metric integrating contractility across the EGJ for three respiratory cycles, best distinguished the All Criteria PPI‐NR subgroup from controls and other PPI‐NR subgroups. Normal values (median, [IQR]) for this measure were 39 mmHg‐cm [25–55 mmHg‐cm]. The correlation between the EGJ‐CI and a previously proposed metric, the lower esophageal sphincter‐pressure integral, that used a fixed 10 s time frame and an atmospheric as opposed to gastric pressure reference was weak.</p> </sec> <sec id="nmo12267-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions & Inferences</title> <p>Among HRM metrics tested, the EGJ‐CI was best in distinguishing PPI‐NRs meeting all criteria of abnormality on pH‐impedance testing. Future prospective studies are required to explore its utility in management of broader groups of gastroesophageal reflux disease patients.</p> </sec> </abstract>