Incidence and Risk of Sorafenib‐Induced Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Issue 3 (12th March 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Li, Yan; Li, Shun; Zhu, Yaofeng; Liang, Xinyue; Meng, Hui; Chen, Jun; Zhang, Dongqing; Guo, Hu; Shi, Benkang
• Is Part Of: Journal of clinical hypertension. Volume 16:Issue 3(2014:Mar.)
• Page Start: 177
• Page End: 185
• Publication Date: 2014-03-12
• Subjects: Hypertension -- Periodicals; 616.132
• DOI: 10.1111/jch.12273
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1524-6175

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="jch12273-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Hypertension is one of the major side effects of sorafenib, and reported incidences vary substantially among clinical trials. A systematic review was conducted using Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for all longitudinal studies to investigate the incidence and risk of hypertension events in cancer patients treated with sorafenib. A total of 14 randomized controlled trials and 39 prospective single‐arm trials involving 13, 555 patients were selected for the meta‐analysis. The relative risk of all‐grade and high‐grade hypertension associated with sorafenib were 3.07 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.05–4.60; <italic>P</italic><.01) and 3.31 (95% CI, 2.21–4.95; <italic>P</italic><.01), respectively. The overall incidence of sorafenib‐induced all‐grade and high‐grade hypertension were 19.1% (95% CI, 15.8%–22.4%) and 4.3% (95% CI, 3.0%–5.5%), respectively. A significantly higher incidence of hypertension was noted in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) compared with those with non‐RCC malignancies (all‐grade: 24.9% [95% CI, 19.7%–30.1%] vs 15.7% [95% CI, 12.1%–19.3%]; <italic>P</italic><.05; high‐grade:8.6% [95% CI, 6.0%–11.2%] vs 1.8% [95% CI, 0.9%–2.6%]; <italic>P</italic><.05). The trials with median progression‐free survival (PFS) longer than 5.3 months (mean PFS) demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of high‐grade hypertension than trials with shorter PFS (6.3% [95% CI, 4.1%–8.5%] vs 2.6% [95% CI, 1.4%–3.8%]; <italic>P</italic><.05). Findings of the meta‐analysis indicated a significantly high risk of sorafenib‐induced hypertension. Patients with RCC have a significantly higher incidence of hypertension and the occurrence of hypertension may be associated with improved prognosis.</p> </abstract>