Estimation and comparison of cumulative incidences of biliary self‐expandable metallic stent dysfunction accounting for competing risks. Issue 2 (8th May 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Estimation and comparison of cumulative incidences of biliary self‐expandable metallic stent dysfunction accounting for competing risks. Issue 2 (8th May 2013)
- Main Title:
- Estimation and comparison of cumulative incidences of biliary self‐expandable metallic stent dysfunction accounting for competing risks
- Authors:
- Hamada, Tsuyoshi
Nakai, Yousuke
Isayama, Hiroyuki
Togawa, Osamu
Kogure, Hirofumi
Kawakubo, Kazumichi
Tsujino, Takeshi
Sasahira, Naoki
Hirano, Kenji
Yamamoto, Natsuyo
Ito, Yukiko
Sasaki, Takashi
Mizuno, Suguru
Toda, Nobuo
Tada, Minoru
Koike, Kazuhiko - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="den12120-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Self‐expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement is widely carried out for distal malignant biliary obstruction, and survival analysis is used to evaluate the cumulative incidences of SEMS dysfunction (e.g. the Kaplan–Meier [KM] method and the log–rank test). However, these statistical methods might be inappropriate in the presence of 'competing risks' (here, death without SEMS dysfunction), which affects the probability of experiencing the event of interest (SEMS dysfunction); that is, SEMS dysfunction can no longer be observed after death. A competing risk analysis has rarely been done in studies on SEMS.</p> </sec> <sec id="den12120-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Patients and Methods</title> <p>We introduced the concept of a competing risk analysis and illustrated its impact on the evaluation of SEMS outcomes using hypothetical and actual data. Our illustrative study included 476 consecutive patients who underwent SEMS placement for unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction.</p> </sec> <sec id="den12120-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>A significant difference between cumulative incidences of SEMS dysfunction in male and female patients via theKM method (<italic>P</italic> = 0.044 by the log–rank test) disappeared after applying a competing risk analysis<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="den12120-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Self‐expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement is widely carried out for distal malignant biliary obstruction, and survival analysis is used to evaluate the cumulative incidences of SEMS dysfunction (e.g. the Kaplan–Meier [KM] method and the log–rank test). However, these statistical methods might be inappropriate in the presence of 'competing risks' (here, death without SEMS dysfunction), which affects the probability of experiencing the event of interest (SEMS dysfunction); that is, SEMS dysfunction can no longer be observed after death. A competing risk analysis has rarely been done in studies on SEMS.</p> </sec> <sec id="den12120-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Patients and Methods</title> <p>We introduced the concept of a competing risk analysis and illustrated its impact on the evaluation of SEMS outcomes using hypothetical and actual data. Our illustrative study included 476 consecutive patients who underwent SEMS placement for unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction.</p> </sec> <sec id="den12120-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>A significant difference between cumulative incidences of SEMS dysfunction in male and female patients via theKM method (<italic>P</italic> = 0.044 by the log–rank test) disappeared after applying a competing risk analysis (<italic>P</italic> = 0.115 by Gray's test). In contrast, although cumulative incidences of SEMS dysfunction via the KM method were similar with and without chemotherapy (<italic>P</italic> = 0.647 by the log–rank test), cumulative incidence of SEMS dysfunction in the non‐chemotherapy group was shown to be significantly lower (<italic>P</italic> = 0.031 by Gray's test) in a competing risk analysis.</p> </sec> <sec id="den12120-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>Death as a competing risk event needs to be appropriately considered in estimating a cumulative incidence of SEMS dysfunction, otherwise analytical results may be biased.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Digestive endoscopy. Volume 26:Issue 2(2014:Mar.)
- Journal:
- Digestive endoscopy
- Issue:
- Volume 26:Issue 2(2014:Mar.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 26, Issue 2 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 26
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0026-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 270
- Page End:
- 275
- Publication Date:
- 2013-05-08
- Subjects:
- Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals
Endoscopy -- Periodicals
Digestive System Diseases -- diagnosis -- Periodicals
Digestive System Diseases -- therapy -- Periodicals
Endoscopy -- Periodicals
616.3 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1111/den.12120 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0915-5635
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3588.346200
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4274.xml