Are they protected? Immunity to vaccine‐preventable diseases in healthcare workers at an Australian hospital. (4th February 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Are they protected? Immunity to vaccine‐preventable diseases in healthcare workers at an Australian hospital. (4th February 2014)
- Main Title:
- Are they protected? Immunity to vaccine‐preventable diseases in healthcare workers at an Australian hospital
- Authors:
- Leung, Vivian
Harper, Susan
Slavin, Monica
Thursky, Karin
Worth, Leon - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <p> <bold>Objective</bold>: Australian guidelines for healthcare worker (HCW) vaccination were updated in 2010, and pre‐employment assessment of new employees has previously been identified as a priority. We determined the vaccination status of a cohort of existing HCWs at a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Victoria.</p> <p> <bold>Methods</bold>: Random sampling of HCWs employed prior to 2006 with unknown/incomplete immunisation status was conducted between April and August 2011. Immunity to vaccine‐preventable diseases (VPDs) was determined serologically (hepatitis B, varicella, measles, mumps, rubella) and by questionnaire (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis), with vaccination by a nurse immuniser.</p> <p> <bold>Results</bold>: Overall, 95 HCWs were evaluated. Mean age and duration of employment were 47.2 and 12.6 years, respectively. Forty‐seven staff (49%) required vaccination to comply with Australian immunisation guidelines: 18% were non‐immune to hepatitis B, 2% to varicella, 8% to measles, 19% to mumps and 13% to rubella. HCWs without serological hepatitis B immunity were all staff with clinical roles. Total costs were $7, 527.34 (mean $222.79/HCW).</p> <p> <bold>Conclusions</bold>: Immunity to VPDs among existing HCWs was inadequate. About half assessed HCWs were non‐immune to at least one VPD, and non‐immunity to hepatitis B was high. A comprehensive assessment strategy for existing employees is required to<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <p> <bold>Objective</bold>: Australian guidelines for healthcare worker (HCW) vaccination were updated in 2010, and pre‐employment assessment of new employees has previously been identified as a priority. We determined the vaccination status of a cohort of existing HCWs at a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Victoria.</p> <p> <bold>Methods</bold>: Random sampling of HCWs employed prior to 2006 with unknown/incomplete immunisation status was conducted between April and August 2011. Immunity to vaccine‐preventable diseases (VPDs) was determined serologically (hepatitis B, varicella, measles, mumps, rubella) and by questionnaire (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis), with vaccination by a nurse immuniser.</p> <p> <bold>Results</bold>: Overall, 95 HCWs were evaluated. Mean age and duration of employment were 47.2 and 12.6 years, respectively. Forty‐seven staff (49%) required vaccination to comply with Australian immunisation guidelines: 18% were non‐immune to hepatitis B, 2% to varicella, 8% to measles, 19% to mumps and 13% to rubella. HCWs without serological hepatitis B immunity were all staff with clinical roles. Total costs were $7, 527.34 (mean $222.79/HCW).</p> <p> <bold>Conclusions</bold>: Immunity to VPDs among existing HCWs was inadequate. About half assessed HCWs were non‐immune to at least one VPD, and non‐immunity to hepatitis B was high. A comprehensive assessment strategy for existing employees is required to enhance vaccination coverage and compliance with national guidelines.</p> <p> <bold>Implications</bold>: Adequately resourced 'look‐back' immunisation assessment programs are required to reduce the risks of VPDs among existing staff and patients. Review of current approaches and national consensus regarding the need for mandatory strategies would assist this process.</p> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Australian and New Zealand journal of public health. Volume 38:Number 1(2014:Feb.)
- Journal:
- Australian and New Zealand journal of public health
- Issue:
- Volume 38:Number 1(2014:Feb.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 38, Issue 1 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 38
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0038-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 83
- Page End:
- 86
- Publication Date:
- 2014-02-04
- Subjects:
- Public health -- Australia -- Periodicals
Public health -- New Zealand -- Periodicals
Medical care -- Australia -- Periodicals
Medical care -- New Zealand -- Periodicals
362.10993 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/australian-and-new-zealand-journal-of-public-health ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1753-6405 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/azph ↗
http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1326-0200&site=1 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/1753-6405.12163 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1326-0200
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1796.894000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4392.xml