The value of model averaging and dynamical climate model predictions for improving statistical seasonal streamflow forecasts over Australia. Issue 10 (16th October 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pokhrel, Prafulla; Wang, Q. J.; Robertson, David E.
• Is Part Of: Water resources research. Volume 49:Issue 10(2013:Oct.)
• Page Start: 6671
• Page End: 6687
• Publication Date: 2013-10-16
• Subjects: Hydrology -- Periodicals; 333.91
• DOI: 10.1002/wrcr.20449
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0043-1397

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>[1] Seasonal streamflow forecasts are valuable for planning and allocation of water resources. In Australia, the Bureau of Meteorology employs a statistical method to forecast seasonal streamflows. The method uses predictors that are related to catchment wetness at the start of a forecast period and to climate during the forecast period. For the latter, a predictor is selected among a number of lagged climate indices as candidates to give the "best" model in terms of model performance in cross validation. This study investigates two strategies for further improvement in seasonal streamflow forecasts. The first is to combine, through Bayesian model averaging, multiple candidate models with different lagged climate indices as predictors, to take advantage of different predictive strengths of the multiple models. The second strategy is to introduce additional candidate models, using rainfall and sea surface temperature predictions from a global climate model as predictors. This is to take advantage of the direct simulations of various dynamic processes. The results show that combining forecasts from multiple statistical models generally yields more skillful forecasts than using only the best model and appears to moderate the worst forecast errors. The use of rainfall predictions from the dynamical climate model marginally improves the streamflow forecasts when viewed over all the study catchments and seasons, but the use of sea surface temperature predictions provide little additional benefit.</p> </abstract>