Resting‐state functional connectivity MRI reveals active processes central to cognition. Issue 2 (23rd January 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stevens, W. Dale; Spreng, R. Nathan
• Is Part Of: Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Volume 5:Issue 2(2014:Mar./Apr.)
• Page Start: 233
• Page End: 245
• Publication Date: 2014-01-23
• Subjects: Cognitive science -- Periodicals; 153.05
• DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1275
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1939-5086

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="wcs1275-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p id="wcs1275-para-0001">Analysis of spontaneously correlated low‐frequency activity fluctuations across the brain using functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)—commonly referred to as resting‐state functional connectivity (RSFC) MRI—was initially seen as a useful tool for mapping functional‐anatomic networks in the living human brain, characterizing brain changes and differences in clinical populations, and studying comparative anatomy across species. However, little was known about the potential relevance of RSFC to cognitive processes. Indeed, there has been considerable controversy and debate as to the utility of studying the resting‐state in cognitive neuroscience. However, recent work has shown that RSFC, rather than merely reflecting passive or epiphenomenal activity within underlying functional‐anatomic networks, reveals important dynamic processes that play an active role in cognition. RSFC has been associated with individual differences in a number of behavioral and cognitive domains, including perception, language, learning and memory, and the organization of conceptual knowledge. In this article, we review and integrate the latest research demonstrating that RSFC is functionally relevant to human behavior and higher‐level cognition, and propose a hypothesis regarding its mechanism of action on functional network dynamics and cognition. We conclude that RSFC MRI will be an invaluable tool for future discovery of the fundamental neurocognitive interactions that underlie cognition. <italic>WIREs Cogn Sci</italic> 2014, 5:233–245. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1275</p> <p id="wcs1275-para-0002">Conflict of interest: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article.</p> <p>For further resources related to this article, please visit the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://wires.wiley.com/remdoi.cgi?doi=10.1002/wcs.1275" xlink:type="simple" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">WIREs website</ext-link>.</p> </abstract>