Improved respiratory efficiency of 3D late gadolinium enhancement imaging using the continuously adaptive windowing strategy (CLAWS). Issue 3 (19th April 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Improved respiratory efficiency of 3D late gadolinium enhancement imaging using the continuously adaptive windowing strategy (CLAWS). Issue 3 (19th April 2013)
- Main Title:
- Improved respiratory efficiency of 3D late gadolinium enhancement imaging using the continuously adaptive windowing strategy (CLAWS)
- Authors:
- Keegan, Jennifer
Jhooti, Permi
Babu‐Narayan, Sonya V
Drivas, Peter
Ernst, Sabine
Firmin, David N. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="mrm24758-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Purpose</title> <p>Acquisition durations of navigator‐gated high‐resolution three‐dimensional late gadolinium enhancement studies may typically be up to 10 min, depending on the respiratory efficiency and heart rate. Implementation of the continuously adaptive windowing strategy (CLAWS) could increase respiratory efficiency, but the resulting non‐smooth k‐space acquisition order during gadolinium wash‐out could result in increased artifact.</p> </sec> <sec id="mrm24758-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Navigator‐gated three‐dimensional late gadolinium enhancement acquisitions were performed in 18 patients using tracking end‐expiratory accept/reject (EE‐ARA) and CLAWS algorithms in random order.</p> </sec> <sec id="mrm24758-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Retrospective analysis of the stored navigator data shows that CLAWS scan times are very close to (within 1%) or equal to the fastest achievable scan times while EE‐ARA significantly extends the acquisition duration (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.0001). EE‐ARA acquisitions are 26% longer than CLAWS acquisitions (378 ± 104 s compared to 301 ± 85 s, <italic>P</italic> = 0.002). Image quality scores for CLAWS and EE‐ARA acquisitions are not significantly different (4.1 ± 0.6 compared to 4.3 ± 0.6, <italic>P</italic> = ns). Numerical phantom<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="mrm24758-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Purpose</title> <p>Acquisition durations of navigator‐gated high‐resolution three‐dimensional late gadolinium enhancement studies may typically be up to 10 min, depending on the respiratory efficiency and heart rate. Implementation of the continuously adaptive windowing strategy (CLAWS) could increase respiratory efficiency, but the resulting non‐smooth k‐space acquisition order during gadolinium wash‐out could result in increased artifact.</p> </sec> <sec id="mrm24758-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Navigator‐gated three‐dimensional late gadolinium enhancement acquisitions were performed in 18 patients using tracking end‐expiratory accept/reject (EE‐ARA) and CLAWS algorithms in random order.</p> </sec> <sec id="mrm24758-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Retrospective analysis of the stored navigator data shows that CLAWS scan times are very close to (within 1%) or equal to the fastest achievable scan times while EE‐ARA significantly extends the acquisition duration (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.0001). EE‐ARA acquisitions are 26% longer than CLAWS acquisitions (378 ± 104 s compared to 301 ± 85 s, <italic>P</italic> = 0.002). Image quality scores for CLAWS and EE‐ARA acquisitions are not significantly different (4.1 ± 0.6 compared to 4.3 ± 0.6, <italic>P</italic> = ns). Numerical phantom simulations show that the non‐uniform k‐space ordering introduced by CLAWS results in slight, but not statistically significant, reductions in both blood signal‐to‐noise ratio (10%) and blood‐myocardium contrast‐to‐noise ratio (12%).</p> </sec> <sec id="mrm24758-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>CLAWS results in markedly reduced acquisition durations compared to EE‐ARA without significant detriment to the image quality. <bold>Magn Reson Med 71:1064–1074, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc</bold>.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Magnetic resonance in medicine. Volume 71:Issue 3(2014:Mar.)
- Journal:
- Magnetic resonance in medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 71:Issue 3(2014:Mar.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 71, Issue 3 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 71
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0071-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 1064
- Page End:
- 1074
- Publication Date:
- 2013-04-19
- Subjects:
- Nuclear magnetic resonance -- Periodicals
Electron paramagnetic resonance -- Periodicals
616.07548 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1522-2594 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/mrm.24758 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0740-3194
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5337.798000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3868.xml