Application of complement component 4d immunohistochemistry to ABO‐compatible and ABO‐incompatible liver transplantation. Issue 2 (February 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Salah, Adeeb; Fujimoto, Masakazu; Yoshizawa, Atsushi; Yurugi, Kimiko; Miyagawa‐Hayashino, Aya; Sumiyoshi, Shinji; Minamiguchi, Sachiko; Uemoto, Shinji; Maekawa, Taira; Haga, Hironori
• Is Part Of: Liver transplantation. Volume 20:Issue 2(2014:Feb.)
• Page Start: 200
• Page End: 209
• Publication Date: 2014-02
• Subjects: Liver -- Transplantation -- Periodicals; Liver -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Liver Transplantation -- Periodicals; Foie -- Greffe -- Périodiques; 617.5560592
• DOI: 10.1002/lt.23789
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1527-6465

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) is difficult to diagnose after ABO‐compatible or ABO‐identical (ABO‐C) liver transplantation. To determine whether complement component 4d (C4d) immunostaining would be useful for diagnosing AMR, we compared the results of C4d immunohistochemistry for allograft biopsy samples with assays for anti‐donor antibodies performed at the time of biopsy. One hundred fourteen patients with ABO‐C grafts and 29 patients with ABO‐incompatible (ABO‐I) grafts were included. Linear C4d endothelial staining (identifiable with a 4× objective lens) or staining seen in 50% or more of the portal tracts was considered positive. Five of the 114 patients (4%) with ABO‐C grafts and 15 of the 29 patients (52%) with ABO‐I grafts showed C4d positivity. In the ABO‐C cases, C4d positivity in late biopsy samples (≥30 days after transplantation) was associated with stage 2 or higher fibrosis (METAVIR score; <italic>P</italic> = 0.01) and with the presence of donor‐specific anti–human leukocyte antigen DR antibodies (HLA‐DR DSAs) with a mean fluorescence intensity > 5000 according to the Luminex single‐antigen bead assay (<italic>P</italic> = 0.04). Conversely, the presence of HLA‐DR DSAs was associated with the presence of stage 2 or higher fibrosis, acute cellular rejection, and C4d positivity. During the 2‐year follow‐up, neither C4d positivity nor HLA‐DR DSAs were related to graft loss. Among ABO‐I patients, C4d positivity was not associated with allograft dysfunction or fibrosis. Only 3 of the 15 C4d‐positive patients (20%) showed periportal hemorrhagic edema, which could be a histological sign of AMR in ABO‐I grafts, and they were the only cases associated with elevations in anti‐donor A/B antibody titers. In conclusion, C4d endothelial positivity among ABO‐C patients is an uncommon event that could be associated with chronic graft damage with or without clinical AMR. C4d positivity is common among ABO‐I patients and may not be associated with allograft dysfunction if alloantibody titers are not elevated. <italic>Liver Transpl 20:200‐209, 2014</italic>. © 2013 AASLD.</p> </abstract>