Coupled hydrogeophysical inversion of time‐lapse surface GPR data to estimate hydraulic properties of a layered subsurface. Issue 12 (17th December 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Busch, Sebastian; Weihermüller, Lutz; Huisman, Johan A.; Steelman, Colby M.; Endres, Anthony L.; Vereecken, Harry; van der, Jan
• Is Part Of: Water resources research. Volume 49:Issue 12(2013:Dec.)
• Page Start: 8480
• Page End: 8494
• Publication Date: 2013-12-17
• Subjects: Hydrology -- Periodicals; 333.91
• DOI: 10.1002/2013WR013992
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0043-1397

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>[1] A major challenge in vadose zone hydrology is to obtain accurate information on the temporal changes of the vertical soil water distribution and its feedback with the atmosphere and groundwater. A state of the art coupled hydrogeophysical inversion scheme is applied to evaluate soil hydraulic properties of a synthetic model and a field soil in southern Ontario based on time‐lapse monitoring of soil dynamics with surface ground‐penetrating radar (GPR). Film flow was included in the hydrological model to account for noncapillary water flow in a sandy medium during dry conditions. The synthetic study illustrated that GPR data contain sufficient information to accurately constrain soil hydraulic parameters within a coupled inversion framework and led to an accurate estimation of the soil hydraulic properties. When film flow was not accounted for within the inversion, an equally good fit could still be achieved. In this case, errors introduced by neglecting film flow were compensated by different hydraulic parameters. For the field data, the coupled inversion reduced the overall misfit compared to an uncalibrated model using hydraulic parameters obtained from laboratory data. Although the data fit improved significantly for water content in the deeper soil layers, accounting for film flow in the uppermost subsurface layer did not lead to a better fit of the GPR data. Further research is needed to describe the processes controlling water content in the dry range, in particular coupled heat and vapor transport. This study illustrates the suitability of surface GPR measurements combined with coupled inversion for near‐surface characterization of soil hydraulic parameters.</p> </abstract>