Mechanical Valve Replacement Versus Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement in the Tricuspid Valve Position. Issue 3 (12th March 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Mechanical Valve Replacement Versus Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement in the Tricuspid Valve Position. Issue 3 (12th March 2013)
- Main Title:
- Mechanical Valve Replacement Versus Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement in the Tricuspid Valve Position
- Authors:
- Cho, Won‐Chul
Park, Chong Bin
Kim, Joon Bum
Jung, Sung‐Ho
Chung, Cheol Hyun
Choo, Suk Jung
Lee, Jae Won - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jocs12093-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and risk of tricuspid valve replacements and to compare bioprosthetic versus mechanical valves.</p> </sec> <sec id="jocs12093-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Between 1991 and 2009, 104 consecutive patients (71 women; mean age, 57 ± 10.8 years) with tricuspid valvular disease underwent mechanical TVR (mechanical group; n = 59) or bioprosthetic TVR (bioprosthesis group; n = 45). Follow‐up was complete in 97.1% (n = 101) with a median duration of 49.9 months (range 0–230 months).</p> </sec> <sec id="jocs12093-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Hospital mortality after mechanical TVR and bioprosthetic TVR was not different on adjusted analysis by propensity score. Ten‐year actuarial survival after mechanical and bioprosthetic TVR was 83.9 ± 7.6% and 61.4 ± 9.1%, respectively (p = 0.004). However, there was also no significant difference in terms of adjusted analysis by propensity score (p = 0.084). No statistically significant difference was detected between mechanical and bioprosthetic valves in regard to event‐free survival.</p> </sec> <sec id="jocs12093-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>Mechanical TVR is not inferior to bioprosthetic TVR in terms of occurrence of valve‐related events, especially<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jocs12093-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and risk of tricuspid valve replacements and to compare bioprosthetic versus mechanical valves.</p> </sec> <sec id="jocs12093-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Between 1991 and 2009, 104 consecutive patients (71 women; mean age, 57 ± 10.8 years) with tricuspid valvular disease underwent mechanical TVR (mechanical group; n = 59) or bioprosthetic TVR (bioprosthesis group; n = 45). Follow‐up was complete in 97.1% (n = 101) with a median duration of 49.9 months (range 0–230 months).</p> </sec> <sec id="jocs12093-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Hospital mortality after mechanical TVR and bioprosthetic TVR was not different on adjusted analysis by propensity score. Ten‐year actuarial survival after mechanical and bioprosthetic TVR was 83.9 ± 7.6% and 61.4 ± 9.1%, respectively (p = 0.004). However, there was also no significant difference in terms of adjusted analysis by propensity score (p = 0.084). No statistically significant difference was detected between mechanical and bioprosthetic valves in regard to event‐free survival.</p> </sec> <sec id="jocs12093-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>Mechanical TVR is not inferior to bioprosthetic TVR in terms of occurrence of valve‐related events, especially anticoagulation‐related complications. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12093 <italic>(J Card Surg 2013;28:212–217)</italic></p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of cardiac surgery. Volume 28:Issue 3(2013:May)
- Journal:
- Journal of cardiac surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 28:Issue 3(2013:May)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 28, Issue 3 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 28
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0028-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 212
- Page End:
- 217
- Publication Date:
- 2013-03-12
- Subjects:
- Heart -- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.412005 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-8191 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/rd.asp?goto=journal&code=jcs ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/jocs.12093 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0886-0440
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4954.863500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3086.xml