Usefulness of Gd‐EOB‐DTPA‐enhanced MR imaging in the evaluation of simple steatosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Issue 5 (21st November 2012)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Usefulness of Gd‐EOB‐DTPA‐enhanced MR imaging in the evaluation of simple steatosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Issue 5 (21st November 2012)
- Main Title:
- Usefulness of Gd‐EOB‐DTPA‐enhanced MR imaging in the evaluation of simple steatosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
- Authors:
- Wu, Zhuo
Matsui, Osamu
Kitao, Azusa
Kozaka, Kazuto
Koda, Wataru
Kobayashi, Satoshi
Ryu, Yasuji
Minami, Tetsuya
Sanada, Junichiro
Gabata, Toshifumi - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="abs1-1" sec-type="section"> <title>Purpose:</title> <p>To evaluate the usefulness of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd‐EOB‐DTPA)‐enhanced MR imaging (EOB‐MRI) in differentiating between simple steatosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), as compared with MR in‐phase/out‐of‐phase imaging. The correlations between the MR features and histological characteristics were preliminarily investigated.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-2" sec-type="section"> <title>Materials and Methods:</title> <p>From April 2008 to October 2011, 25 patients (13 simple steatosis and 12 NASH) who underwent both EOB‐MRI and in‐phase/out‐of‐phase imaging were analyzed. The hepatobiliary‐phase enhancement ratio and signal intensity loss on opposed‐phase T1‐weighted images (fat fraction) were compared between the simple steatosis and NASH groups. In the simple steatosis and NASH groups, the correlations between enhancement ratio and histological grade/stage were explored. In the NASH group, fat fraction was correlated with the steatosis score.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-3" sec-type="section"> <title>Results:</title> <p>The enhancement ratio in NASH was significantly lower than that in simple steatosis (<italic>P</italic> = 0.03). In the simple steatosis and NASH groups, the enhancement ratio was significantly correlated with the fibrosis stage (<italic>r</italic> = −0.469, <italic>P</italic> = 0.018).<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="abs1-1" sec-type="section"> <title>Purpose:</title> <p>To evaluate the usefulness of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd‐EOB‐DTPA)‐enhanced MR imaging (EOB‐MRI) in differentiating between simple steatosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), as compared with MR in‐phase/out‐of‐phase imaging. The correlations between the MR features and histological characteristics were preliminarily investigated.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-2" sec-type="section"> <title>Materials and Methods:</title> <p>From April 2008 to October 2011, 25 patients (13 simple steatosis and 12 NASH) who underwent both EOB‐MRI and in‐phase/out‐of‐phase imaging were analyzed. The hepatobiliary‐phase enhancement ratio and signal intensity loss on opposed‐phase T1‐weighted images (fat fraction) were compared between the simple steatosis and NASH groups. In the simple steatosis and NASH groups, the correlations between enhancement ratio and histological grade/stage were explored. In the NASH group, fat fraction was correlated with the steatosis score.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-3" sec-type="section"> <title>Results:</title> <p>The enhancement ratio in NASH was significantly lower than that in simple steatosis (<italic>P</italic> = 0.03). In the simple steatosis and NASH groups, the enhancement ratio was significantly correlated with the fibrosis stage (<italic>r</italic> = −0.469, <italic>P</italic> = 0.018). Fat fraction in NASH was strongly correlated with the steatosis score (<italic>r</italic> = 0.728, <italic>P</italic> = 0.007).</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-4" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion:</title> <p>In simple steatosis and NASH, the hepatobiliary‐phase enhancement ratio of EOB‐MRI showed significant association with fibrosis stage, and may be a useful discriminating parameter compared with the fat fraction measured by in‐phase/out‐of‐phase imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;37:1137–1143. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of magnetic resonance imaging. Volume 37:Issue 5(2013)
- Journal:
- Journal of magnetic resonance imaging
- Issue:
- Volume 37:Issue 5(2013)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 37, Issue 5 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 37
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0037-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 1137
- Page End:
- 1143
- Publication Date:
- 2012-11-21
- Subjects:
- Magnetic resonance imaging -- Periodicals
616 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1522-2586 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/jmri.23921 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1053-1807
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5010.791000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4397.xml