Assessment of corticospinal tract (CST) damage in acute stroke patients: Comparison of tract‐specific analysis versus segmentation of a CST template. Issue 4 (19th October 2012)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Assessment of corticospinal tract (CST) damage in acute stroke patients: Comparison of tract‐specific analysis versus segmentation of a CST template. Issue 4 (19th October 2012)
- Main Title:
- Assessment of corticospinal tract (CST) damage in acute stroke patients: Comparison of tract‐specific analysis versus segmentation of a CST template
- Authors:
- Vargas, Patricia
Gaudron, Marie
Valabrègue, Romain
Bertasi, Eric
Humbert, Frédéric
Lehéricy, Stéphane
Samson, Yves
Rosso, Charlotte - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="abs1-1" sec-type="section"> <title>Purpose:</title> <p>To compare two techniques to assess corticospinal tract (CST) damage in stroke patients: tract‐specific analysis by probabilistic tractography and segmentation using a CST template.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-2" sec-type="section"> <title>Materials and Methods:</title> <p>We extracted fractional anisotropy (FA) values, the FA ratio, and mean diffusivity (MD) in 18 stroke patients and 21 healthy volunteers matched for age and sex. We compared the two methods in order to determine their ability to detect 1) differences between diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters of healthy volunteers and stroke patients, 2) the correlation between DTI parameters and clinical scores, and 3) the correlation between DTI parameters and blood oxygen level‐dependent (BOLD) signals in a fist‐closure task.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-3" sec-type="section"> <title>Results:</title> <p>FA values were higher with the tractography approach than with the segmentation method, but differences between the ipsilesional CST and the homologous region in healthy subjects were detected using both methods. In patients, clinical scores were significantly correlated with FA values and FA ratios with both methods. The BOLD signal was positively correlated with FA values for CST with the segmentation but not with the tractography approach.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-4" sec-type="section"><abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="abs1-1" sec-type="section"> <title>Purpose:</title> <p>To compare two techniques to assess corticospinal tract (CST) damage in stroke patients: tract‐specific analysis by probabilistic tractography and segmentation using a CST template.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-2" sec-type="section"> <title>Materials and Methods:</title> <p>We extracted fractional anisotropy (FA) values, the FA ratio, and mean diffusivity (MD) in 18 stroke patients and 21 healthy volunteers matched for age and sex. We compared the two methods in order to determine their ability to detect 1) differences between diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters of healthy volunteers and stroke patients, 2) the correlation between DTI parameters and clinical scores, and 3) the correlation between DTI parameters and blood oxygen level‐dependent (BOLD) signals in a fist‐closure task.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-3" sec-type="section"> <title>Results:</title> <p>FA values were higher with the tractography approach than with the segmentation method, but differences between the ipsilesional CST and the homologous region in healthy subjects were detected using both methods. In patients, clinical scores were significantly correlated with FA values and FA ratios with both methods. The BOLD signal was positively correlated with FA values for CST with the segmentation but not with the tractography approach.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-4" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion:</title> <p>CST damage in stroke patients can be assessed by either probabilistic tractography or segmentation of a CST template. Although each method has advantages and limitations, both are sensitive enough to detect differences among stroke patients and identify specific correlations with clinical scores. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2013;37:836–845. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of magnetic resonance imaging. Volume 37:Issue 4(2013)
- Journal:
- Journal of magnetic resonance imaging
- Issue:
- Volume 37:Issue 4(2013)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 37, Issue 4 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 37
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0037-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 836
- Page End:
- 845
- Publication Date:
- 2012-10-19
- Subjects:
- Magnetic resonance imaging -- Periodicals
616 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1522-2586 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/jmri.23870 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1053-1807
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5010.791000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3221.xml