Reproducibility of first‐pass cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion. Issue 4 (18th January 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Larghat, Abdulghani M.; Maredia, Neil; Biglands, John; Greenwood, John P.; Ball, Stephen G.; Jerosch‐Herold, Michael; Radjenovic, Aleksandra; Plein, Sven
• Is Part Of: Journal of magnetic resonance imaging. Volume 37:Issue 4(2013)
• Page Start: 865
• Page End: 874
• Publication Date: 2013-01-18
• Subjects: Magnetic resonance imaging -- Periodicals; 616
• DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23889
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1053-1807

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="abs1-1" sec-type="section"> <title>Purpose:</title> <p>To assess the reproducibility of semiquantitative and quantitative analysis of first‐pass myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in healthy volunteers.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-2" sec-type="section"> <title>Materials and Methods:</title> <p>Eleven volunteers underwent myocardial perfusion CMR during adenosine stress and rest on 2 separate days. Perfusion data were acquired in a single mid‐ventricular section in two cardiac phases to permit cardiac phase reproducibility comparisons. Semiquantitative analysis was performed to derive normalized upslopes of myocardial signal intensity profiles (myocardial perfusion index, MPI). The quantitative analysis estimated absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) using Fermi‐constrained deconvolution. The perfusion reserve index was calculated by dividing stress by rest data. Two observers performed all the measurements independently. One observer repeated all first scan measurements 4 weeks later.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-3" sec-type="section"> <title>Results:</title> <p>The reproducibility of perfusion CMR was highest for semiquantitative analysis with an intraobserver coefficient of variability (CoV) of 3%–7% and interobserver CoV of 4%–10%. Semiquantitative interstudy comparison was less reproducible (CoV of 13%–27%). Quantitative intraobserver CoV of 10%–18%, interobserver CoV of 8%–15% and interstudy CoV of 20%–41%. Reproducibility of systolic and diastolic phases and the endocardial and epicardial myocardial layer showed similar reproducibility on both semiquantitative and quantitative analysis.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-4" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion:</title> <p>The reproducibility of CMR myocardial perfusion estimates is good, but varies between intraobserver, interobserver, and interstudy comparisons. In this study semiquantitative analysis was more reproducible than quantitative analysis. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2013;37:865–874. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p> </sec> </abstract>