Are preference and resistance to change convergent expressions of stimulus value?. Issue 1 (29th May 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Podlesnik, Christopher A.; Jimenez‐Gomez, Corina; Shahan, Timothy A.
• Is Part Of: Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior. Volume 100:Issue 1(2013:Jul.)
• Page Start: 27
• Page End: 48
• Publication Date: 2013-05-29
• Subjects: Psychology -- Periodicals; 150.724
• DOI: 10.1002/jeab.33
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-5002

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jeab33-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <p>Behavioral momentum theory asserts that preference and relative resistance to disruption depend on reinforcement rates and provide converging expressions of the conditioned value of discriminative stimuli. However, preference and resistance to disruption diverge when assessing preference during brief extinction probes. We expanded upon this opposing relation by arranging target stimuli signaling equal variable‐interval schedules across components of a multiple schedule. We paired one target stimulus with a richer reinforced alternative and the other with a leaner alternative. Furthermore, we varied reinforcement rates for the paired alternatives to assess the effects of manipulating relative conditioned value on preference and resistance to disruption by presession feeding, intercomponent food, and extinction. We replicated the opposing relation between preference and resistance to disruption but varying reinforcement rates for the paired alternatives did not systematically affect preference or resistance to disruption beyond levels observed in our initial condition. Importantly, we found that only preference between the target stimuli was related to relative baseline response rates in the presence of those stimuli. These findings suggest that preference during extinction probes might reveal more about baseline response rates between concurrently available alternatives than relative conditioned value. Resistance to disruption, conversely, appears to better reflect conditioned value because it is less confounded with baseline response rates and is a function of all sources of reinforcement obtained in the presence of a stimulus context.</p> </sec> </abstract>