Predictors of unsuccessful mobilization with granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor alone in patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Issue 4 (21st February 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Predictors of unsuccessful mobilization with granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor alone in patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Issue 4 (21st February 2013)
- Main Title:
- Predictors of unsuccessful mobilization with granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor alone in patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
- Authors:
- Chow, Signy
Lazo‐Langner, Alejandro
Ormond, George
Howson‐Jan, Kang
Xenocostas, Anargyros - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells is achieved with hematopoietic growth factors with or without chemotherapy or other agents. Although studies comparing granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) alone to combined regimens demonstrate an increase in stem cell yield in the latter, mobilization with G‐CSF alone is still effective and has been widely practiced. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients at our institution who underwent at least one mobilization attempt with G‐CSF between January 2000 and December 2008 to identify the proportion of patients failing one or more mobilization attempts and the potential predictors of mobilization failure with this regime. Out of 293 patients, 251 (86.6%) were successfully mobilized and 244 (83.6%) underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Median yield was 3.55 × 10<sup>6</sup> CD34<sup>+</sup> cells/kg. On univariate analysis, mobilization success was influenced by degree of previous treatment and underlying diagnosis (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001 each) but not by age (<italic>P</italic> = 0.114), sex (<italic>P</italic> = 0.860), or radiotherapy (<italic>P</italic> = 0.454). A diagnosis of non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and number of previous chemotherapy regimens were predictors of failure on multivariate analysis. CD34<sup>+</sup> yield was influenced by diagnosis and previous chemotherapy<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells is achieved with hematopoietic growth factors with or without chemotherapy or other agents. Although studies comparing granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) alone to combined regimens demonstrate an increase in stem cell yield in the latter, mobilization with G‐CSF alone is still effective and has been widely practiced. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients at our institution who underwent at least one mobilization attempt with G‐CSF between January 2000 and December 2008 to identify the proportion of patients failing one or more mobilization attempts and the potential predictors of mobilization failure with this regime. Out of 293 patients, 251 (86.6%) were successfully mobilized and 244 (83.6%) underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Median yield was 3.55 × 10<sup>6</sup> CD34<sup>+</sup> cells/kg. On univariate analysis, mobilization success was influenced by degree of previous treatment and underlying diagnosis (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001 each) but not by age (<italic>P</italic> = 0.114), sex (<italic>P</italic> = 0.860), or radiotherapy (<italic>P</italic> = 0.454). A diagnosis of non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and number of previous chemotherapy regimens were predictors of failure on multivariate analysis. CD34<sup>+</sup> yield was influenced by diagnosis and previous chemotherapy (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001 each). Mobilization with G‐CSF alone yields adequate collections for most patients; however, heavily pretreated NHL patients with one failed attempt had high rates of remobilization failure and should be considered for alternative regimens. J. Clin. Apheresis 28:285–292, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of clinical apheresis. Volume 28:Issue 4(2014:Aug.)
- Journal:
- Journal of clinical apheresis
- Issue:
- Volume 28:Issue 4(2014:Aug.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 28, Issue 4 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 28
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0028-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 285
- Page End:
- 292
- Publication Date:
- 2013-02-21
- Subjects:
- Hemapheresis -- Periodicals
Blood -- Transfusion -- Periodicals
Blood -- Transfusion, Autologous -- Periodicals
Cell separation -- Periodicals
Leukapheresis -- Periodicals
Plasmapheresis -- Periodicals
615.39 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1098-1101 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/jca.21252 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0733-2459
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4958.381500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3833.xml