Reliability and validity of the Italian self‐evaluation of communication experiences after laryngeal cancer questionnaire. Issue 11 (20th November 2012)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Schindler, Antonio; Mozzanica, Francesco; Brignoli, Francesca; Maruzzi, Patrizia; Evitts, Paul; Ottaviani, Francesco
• Is Part Of: Head & neck. Volume 35:Issue 11(2013:Nov.)
• Page Start: 1606
• Page End: 1615
• Publication Date: 2012-11-20
• Subjects: Head -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Neck -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Head -- Periodicals; Neck -- Periodicals; Face -- Periodicals; 617.51059
• DOI: 10.1002/hed.23198
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1043-3074

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="hed23198-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>The Self‐Evaluation of Communication Experiences after Laryngeal Cancer (SECEL) questionnaire assesses the impact of total laryngectomy on communication‐related quality of life (QOL). This study evaluates the Italian version of the SECEL (I‐SECEL), including reliability, concurrent validity, and differences in scores between patients who undergo either total laryngectomy or partial laryngectomy.</p> </sec> <sec id="hed23198-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Eighty patients who underwent either total laryngectomy or partial laryngectomy completed the I‐SECEL twice and the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36) questionnaires once. Voice recordings were used for objective and perceptual assessment.</p> </sec> <sec id="hed23198-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>The I‐SECEL demonstrated good test–retest reliability and internal consistency for 2 of 3 subscales. Correlations were moderate to strong between most of the I‐SECEL scales and the VHI/SF‐36 scales. The I‐SECEL scales demonstrated moderate associations with most perceptual and objective measures.</p> </sec> <sec id="hed23198-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>Preliminary evidence supports the convergent validity, test‐retest reliability, and internal consistency of the I‐SECEL, notwithstanding low internal consistency and test–retest reliability for 1 subscale. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. <italic>Head Neck</italic>, <bold>35</bold>: 1606–1615, 2013</p> </sec> </abstract>