SBERIA: Set‐Based Gene‐Environment Interaction Test for Rare and Common Variants in Complex Diseases. Issue 5 (29th May 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jiao, Shuo; Hsu, Li; Bézieau, Stéphane; Brenner, Hermann; Chan, Andrew T.; Chang‐Claude, Jenny; Le Marchand, Loic; Lemire, Mathieu; Newcomb, Polly A.; Slattery, Martha L.; Peters, Ulrike
• Is Part Of: Genetic epidemiology. Volume 37:Issue 5(2013)
• Page Start: 452
• Page End: 464
• Publication Date: 2013-05-29
• Subjects: Genetic epidemiology -- Periodicals; Heredity -- Periodicals; Medical geography -- Periodicals; 614
• DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21735
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0741-0395

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>ABSTRACT</title> <p>Identification of gene‐environment interaction (G × E) is important in understanding the etiology of complex diseases. However, partially due to the lack of power, there have been very few replicated G × E findings compared to the success in marginal association studies. The existing G × E testing methods mainly focus on improving the power for individual markers. In this paper, we took a different strategy and proposed a set‐based gene‐environment interaction test (SBERIA), which can improve the power by reducing the multiple testing burdens and aggregating signals within a set. The major challenge of the signal aggregation within a set is how to tell signals from noise and how to determine the direction of the signals. SBERIA takes advantage of the established correlation screening for G × E to guide the aggregation of genotypes within a marker set. The correlation screening has been shown to be an efficient way of selecting potential G × E candidate SNPs in case‐control studies for complex diseases. Importantly, the correlation screening in case‐control combined samples is independent of the interaction test. With this desirable feature, SBERIA maintains the correct type I error level and can be easily implemented in a regular logistic regression setting. We showed that SBERIA had higher power than benchmark methods in various simulation scenarios, both for common and rare variants. We also applied SBERIA to real genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) data of 10, 729 colorectal cancer cases and 13, 328 controls and found evidence of interaction between the set of known colorectal cancer susceptibility loci and smoking.</p> </abstract>