Efficient Two‐Step Testing of Gene‐Gene Interactions in Genome‐Wide Association Studies. Issue 5 (30th April 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lewinger, Juan Pablo; Morrison, John L.; Thomas, Duncan C.; Murcray, Cassandra E.; Conti, David V.; Li, Dalin; Gauderman, W. James
• Is Part Of: Genetic epidemiology. Volume 37:Issue 5(2013)
• Page Start: 440
• Page End: 451
• Publication Date: 2013-04-30
• Subjects: Genetic epidemiology -- Periodicals; Heredity -- Periodicals; Medical geography -- Periodicals; 614
• DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21720
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0741-0395

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>ABSTRACT</title> <p>Exhaustive testing of all possible SNP pairs in a genome‐wide association study (GWAS) generally yields low power to detect gene‐gene (G × G) interactions because of small effect sizes and stringent requirements for multiple‐testing correction. We introduce a new two‐step procedure for testing G × G interactions in case‐control GWAS to detect interacting single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) regardless of their marginal effects. In an initial screening step, all SNP pairs are tested for gene‐gene association in the combined sample of cases and controls. In the second step, the pairs that pass the screening are followed up with a traditional test for G × G interaction. We show that the two‐step method is substantially more powerful to detect G × G interactions than the exhaustive testing approach. For example, with 2, 000 cases and 2, 000 controls, the two‐step method can have more than 90% power to detect an interaction odds ratio of 2.0 compared to less than 50% power for the exhaustive testing approach. Moreover, we show that a hybrid two‐step approach that combines our newly proposed two‐step test and the two‐step test that screens for marginal effects retains the best power properties of both. The two‐step procedures we introduce have the potential to uncover genetic signals that have not been previously identified in an initial single‐SNP GWAS. We demonstrate the computational feasibility of the two‐step G × G procedure by performing a G × G scan in the asthma GWAS of the University of Southern California Children's Health Study.</p> </abstract>