Competitive Bond Rupture in the Photodissociation of Bromoacetyl Chloride and 2‐ and 3‐Bromopropionyl Chloride: Adiabatic versus Diabatic Dissociation. Issue 5 (10th February 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hsu, Ming‐Yi; Tsai, Po‐Yu; Wei, Zheng‐Rong; Chao, Meng‐Hsuan; Zhang, Bing; Kasai, Toshio; Lin, King‐Chuen
• Is Part Of: Chemphyschem. Volume 14:Issue 5(2013)
• Page Start: 936
• Page End: 945
• Publication Date: 2013-02-10
• Subjects: Chemistry, Physical and theoretical -- Periodicals; 541.05
• DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201200957
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1439-4235

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>Competitive bond dissociation mechanisms for bromoacetyl chloride and 2‐ and 3‐bromopropionyl chloride following the ¹[n(O)→π*(CO)] transition at 234–235 nm are investigated. Branching ratios for CBr/CCl bond fission are found by using the (2+1) resonance‐enhanced multiphoton ionization (REMPI) technique coupled with velocity ion imaging. The fragment branching ratios depend mainly on the dissociation pathways and the distances between the orbitals of Br and the CO chromophore. CCl bond fission is anticipated to follow an adiabatic potential surface for a strong diabatic coupling between the n(O)π*(CO) and n_p(Cl)σ*(CCl) bands. In contrast, CBr bond fission is subject to much weaker coupling between n(O)π*(CO) and n_p(Br)σ*(CBr). Thus, a diabatic pathway is preferred for bromoacetyl chloride and 2‐bromopropionyl chloride, which leads to excited‐state products. For 3‐bromopropionyl chloride, the available energy is not high enough to reach the excited‐state products such that CBr bond fission must proceed through an adiabatic pathway with severe suppression by nonadiabatic coupling. The fragment translational energies and anisotropy parameters for the three molecules are also analyzed and appropriately interpreted.</p> </abstract>