Effects of Dronedarone Started Rapidly After Amiodarone Discontinuation. Issue 2 (21st January 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Effects of Dronedarone Started Rapidly After Amiodarone Discontinuation. Issue 2 (21st January 2013)
- Main Title:
- Effects of Dronedarone Started Rapidly After Amiodarone Discontinuation
- Authors:
- Immordino, Laura
Connolly, Stuart
Crijns, Harry
Roy, Denis
Capucci, Alessandro
Radzik, David
Aliot, Etienne
Hohnloser, Stefan
Kowey, Peter - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="abs1-1" sec-type="section"> <title>Background:</title> <p>Multiple studies have shown that amiodarone is effective in treating atrial fibrillation (AF), but is associated with a relatively high incidence of side effects; however, due to amiodarone's long elimination half‐life (20–100 days), physicians may hesitate to start other drugs until it has fully cleared.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-2" sec-type="section"> <title>Hypothesis:</title> <p>A rapid switch from amiodarone to dronedarone is feasible.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-3" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods:</title> <p>EURIDIS and ADONIS were double‐blind, multinational, parallel‐group trials comparing the efficacy and safety of dronedarone with placebo over 12 months. This retrospective subanalysis of EURIDIS/ADONIS compared the effects of dronedarone in patients discontinuing amiodarone within 2 days before randomization ("rapid switch") with results in patients who had received no amiodarone during the 2 months preceding randomization.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-4" sec-type="section"> <title>Results:</title> <p>In total, 1237 patients were enrolled ("rapid switch", n = 154; "no amiodarone", n = 1014). In both the "rapid switch" and the "no amiodarone" groups, dronedarone users had significantly lower AF recurrence than patients receiving placebo (HR = 0.64, 95% CI, 0.44–0.95; <italic>P</italic> = 0.0224 and HR = 0.79, 95% CI, 0.67–0.92;<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="abs1-1" sec-type="section"> <title>Background:</title> <p>Multiple studies have shown that amiodarone is effective in treating atrial fibrillation (AF), but is associated with a relatively high incidence of side effects; however, due to amiodarone's long elimination half‐life (20–100 days), physicians may hesitate to start other drugs until it has fully cleared.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-2" sec-type="section"> <title>Hypothesis:</title> <p>A rapid switch from amiodarone to dronedarone is feasible.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-3" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods:</title> <p>EURIDIS and ADONIS were double‐blind, multinational, parallel‐group trials comparing the efficacy and safety of dronedarone with placebo over 12 months. This retrospective subanalysis of EURIDIS/ADONIS compared the effects of dronedarone in patients discontinuing amiodarone within 2 days before randomization ("rapid switch") with results in patients who had received no amiodarone during the 2 months preceding randomization.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-4" sec-type="section"> <title>Results:</title> <p>In total, 1237 patients were enrolled ("rapid switch", n = 154; "no amiodarone", n = 1014). In both the "rapid switch" and the "no amiodarone" groups, dronedarone users had significantly lower AF recurrence than patients receiving placebo (HR = 0.64, 95% CI, 0.44–0.95; <italic>P</italic> = 0.0224 and HR = 0.79, 95% CI, 0.67–0.92; <italic>P</italic> = 0.0027, respectively). Dronedarone users had a higher incidence of bradyarrhythmic events than placebo‐treated patients. A "rapid switch" from amiodarone to dronedarone was associated with a higher incidence of serious heart failure events and heart failure hospitalizations versus all other groups. Overall event rates were low and there was no significant difference in total adverse event rates or deaths between groups.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs1-5" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion:</title> <p>In this patient population, a switch from amiodarone to dronedarone within a 2‐day time frame might be feasible in certain patient categories, but further investigation is warranted.</p> <p>The ADONIS/EURIDIS studies and this post hoc analysis were funded by sanofi‐aventis.</p> <p>The authors have no other funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical cardiology. Volume 36:Issue 2(2013:Feb.)
- Journal:
- Clinical cardiology
- Issue:
- Volume 36:Issue 2(2013:Feb.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 36, Issue 2 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 36
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0036-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 88
- Page End:
- 95
- Publication Date:
- 2013-01-21
- Subjects:
- Cardiology -- Periodicals
616.12005 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1932-8737/issues ↗
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/113412417/home ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/clc.22090 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0160-9289
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.265000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3186.xml