Comparison of efficacy and safety of intracoronary sodium nitroprusside and intravenous adenosine for assessing fractional flow reserve. Issue 3 (15th October 2012)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of efficacy and safety of intracoronary sodium nitroprusside and intravenous adenosine for assessing fractional flow reserve. Issue 3 (15th October 2012)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of efficacy and safety of intracoronary sodium nitroprusside and intravenous adenosine for assessing fractional flow reserve
- Authors:
- Rudzinski, Wojciech
Waller, Alfonso H.
Rusovici, Arthur
Dehnee, Abed
Nasur, Ali
Benz, Michael
Sanchez, Salvador
Klapholz, Marc
Kaluski, Edo - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="ccd24652-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intracoronary (IC) nitroprusside and intravenous adenosine (IVA) for assessing fractional flow reserve (FFR).</p> </sec> <sec id="ccd24652-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>IV infusion of adenosine is a standard method to achieve a coronary hyperemia for FFR measurement. However, adenosine is expensive, causes multiple side effects, and is contraindicated in patients with reactive airway disease. Sodium nitroprusside (NTP) is a strong coronary vasodilator but its efficacy and safety for assessing FFR is not well established.</p> </sec> <sec id="ccd24652-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>We compared FFR response and side effects profile of IC NTP and IVA. Bolus of NTP at a dose of 100 μg and IVA (140 μg/kg/min) were used to achieve coronary hyperemia.</p> </sec> <sec id="ccd24652-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>We evaluated 75 lesions in 53 patients (60% male) mean age 61.6 ± 13.9 years. Mean FFR after NTP was similar to FFR after adenosine (0.836 ± 0.107 vs. 0.856 ± 0.106; <italic>P</italic> = 0.26; <italic>r</italic> = 0.91, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001). NTP induced maximal stable hyperemia within 10 sec (mean: 6.4 ± 1) which lasted consistently between 38 and 60 sec (mean 51<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="ccd24652-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objectives</title> <p>The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intracoronary (IC) nitroprusside and intravenous adenosine (IVA) for assessing fractional flow reserve (FFR).</p> </sec> <sec id="ccd24652-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>IV infusion of adenosine is a standard method to achieve a coronary hyperemia for FFR measurement. However, adenosine is expensive, causes multiple side effects, and is contraindicated in patients with reactive airway disease. Sodium nitroprusside (NTP) is a strong coronary vasodilator but its efficacy and safety for assessing FFR is not well established.</p> </sec> <sec id="ccd24652-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>We compared FFR response and side effects profile of IC NTP and IVA. Bolus of NTP at a dose of 100 μg and IVA (140 μg/kg/min) were used to achieve coronary hyperemia.</p> </sec> <sec id="ccd24652-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>We evaluated 75 lesions in 53 patients (60% male) mean age 61.6 ± 13.9 years. Mean FFR after NTP was similar to FFR after adenosine (0.836 ± 0.107 vs. 0.856 ± 0.106; <italic>P</italic> = 0.26; <italic>r</italic> = 0.91, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001). NTP induced maximal stable hyperemia within 10 sec (mean: 6.4 ± 1) which lasted consistently between 38 and 60 sec (mean 51 ± 7.5). NTP caused significant (14%), but asymptomatic decrease in mean blood pressure which returned to baseline within 60 sec. Adenosine caused shortness of breath in 26%, headache and flushing in 19%, and transient second degree heart block in 6% of patients. No adverse symptoms were reported after NTP.</p> </sec> <sec id="ccd24652-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>IC NTP is as effective as IVA for measuring FFR. NTP is better tolerated by patients. Since NTP is inexpensive, readily available, well tolerated, and safe, it may be a better choice for FFR assessment. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions. Volume 81:Issue 3(2013:Feb. 15)
- Journal:
- Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
- Issue:
- Volume 81:Issue 3(2013:Feb. 15)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 81, Issue 3 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 81
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0081-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 540
- Page End:
- 544
- Publication Date:
- 2012-10-15
- Subjects:
- Heart -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals
Cardiac catheterization -- Periodicals
616.1207572 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1522-726X ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/ccd.24652 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1522-1946
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3092.992000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3834.xml