Secondary Interventions After Endovascular Thoracic Aortic Repair. Issue 1 (27th November 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Secondary Interventions After Endovascular Thoracic Aortic Repair. Issue 1 (27th November 2013)
- Main Title:
- Secondary Interventions After Endovascular Thoracic Aortic Repair
- Authors:
- Botsios, Spiridon
Frömke, Johannes
Walterbusch, Gerhard
Schuermann, Karl
Subramanian, Sreekumar
Reinstadler, Jan
Dohmen, Guido - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jocs12252-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Endovascular stent grafting of the descending thoracic aorta has evolved rapidly and is now the standard of care for certain patient subsets. However, the durability of this technique is limited by the development of technique‐specific complications at mid‐term follow‐up. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, techniques, and outcomes of secondary intervention for complications after stent grafting of the descending thoracic aorta.</p> </sec> <sec id="jocs12252-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Between March 2001 and November 2011, 152 patients underwent endovascular thoracic aortic repair (TEVAR). We identified 19 (12.5%) patients from this cohort who required secondary interventions.</p> </sec> <sec id="jocs12252-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>The indications for TEVAR were type B aortic dissection in 12 patients, thoracic aortic aneurysm in six patients, and intramural hematoma in one patient. The mean time between TEVAR and secondary intervention was 20.49 ± 24.90 months (range, 1.2–83 months). A secondary endovascular intervention was required in eleven patient, six patients required secondary surgical therapy, and hybrid procedures were performed in two patients. Endoleaks were the most common indication for a secondary intervention. The 30‐day mortality rate was<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jocs12252-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Endovascular stent grafting of the descending thoracic aorta has evolved rapidly and is now the standard of care for certain patient subsets. However, the durability of this technique is limited by the development of technique‐specific complications at mid‐term follow‐up. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, techniques, and outcomes of secondary intervention for complications after stent grafting of the descending thoracic aorta.</p> </sec> <sec id="jocs12252-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Between March 2001 and November 2011, 152 patients underwent endovascular thoracic aortic repair (TEVAR). We identified 19 (12.5%) patients from this cohort who required secondary interventions.</p> </sec> <sec id="jocs12252-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>The indications for TEVAR were type B aortic dissection in 12 patients, thoracic aortic aneurysm in six patients, and intramural hematoma in one patient. The mean time between TEVAR and secondary intervention was 20.49 ± 24.90 months (range, 1.2–83 months). A secondary endovascular intervention was required in eleven patient, six patients required secondary surgical therapy, and hybrid procedures were performed in two patients. Endoleaks were the most common indication for a secondary intervention. The 30‐day mortality rate was 10.5% (2/19). Two perioperative deaths were observed following surgical therapy. During the mean follow‐up of 78.06 ± 37.37 months (range, 23–142 months) after TEVAR, four unrelated deaths occurred, two patients were lost to follow‐up, and four patients required a further intervention.</p> </sec> <sec id="jocs12252-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>Secondary intervention after endovascular stent grafting of the descending thoracic aorta was not infrequently required and can be performed with acceptable risks. However, serial, systematic follow‐up is essential to detect late complications and to perform secondary procedures, preferably under elective circumstances. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12252 <italic>(J Card Surg 2014;29:66‐73)</italic></p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of cardiac surgery. Volume 29:Issue 1(2014:Jan.)
- Journal:
- Journal of cardiac surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 29:Issue 1(2014:Jan.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 29, Issue 1 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 29
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0029-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 66
- Page End:
- 73
- Publication Date:
- 2013-11-27
- Subjects:
- Heart -- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.412005 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-8191 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/rd.asp?goto=journal&code=jcs ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/jocs.12252 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0886-0440
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4954.863500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3612.xml