Hepatic steatosis: Effect on hepatocyte enhancement with gadoxetate disodium‐enhanced liver MR imaging. Issue 1 (24th September 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Hepatic steatosis: Effect on hepatocyte enhancement with gadoxetate disodium‐enhanced liver MR imaging. Issue 1 (24th September 2013)
- Main Title:
- Hepatic steatosis: Effect on hepatocyte enhancement with gadoxetate disodium‐enhanced liver MR imaging
- Authors:
- Onishi, Hiromitsu
Theisen, Daniel
Dietrich, Olaf
Reiser, Maximilian F.
Zech, Christoph J. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="jmri24136-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Purpose</title> <p>To investigate the effect of hepatic steatosis on enhancement of liver parenchyma with gadoxetate disodium‐enhanced MR imaging.</p> </sec> <sec id="jmri24136-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Materials and Methods</title> <p>Gadoxetate disodium‐enhanced MR images of 166 patients were analyzed. Liver–spleen contrast and liver–spleen relative enhancement ratio on three‐dimensional gradient echo T1‐weighted images with fat suppression 20 minutes after injection of gadoxetate disodium were evaluated in correlation with fat signal fraction using the Pearson correlation coefficient and also compared between patients with normal liver parenchyma (n = 115) and with liver steatosis (n = 51) using the Student t‐test.</p> </sec> <sec id="jmri24136-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>The liver–spleen contrast at hepatobiliary phase showed inverse correlations with the fat signal fraction (r = −0.36; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.01), while the liver–spleen relative enhancement ratio showed no statistical correlation with the fat signal fraction (<italic>P</italic> = 0.80). The liver–spleen contrast in the group with steatotic liver was significantly lower than that in the group with normal livers (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001). There was no significant difference in the relative enhancement ratio between the<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="jmri24136-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Purpose</title> <p>To investigate the effect of hepatic steatosis on enhancement of liver parenchyma with gadoxetate disodium‐enhanced MR imaging.</p> </sec> <sec id="jmri24136-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Materials and Methods</title> <p>Gadoxetate disodium‐enhanced MR images of 166 patients were analyzed. Liver–spleen contrast and liver–spleen relative enhancement ratio on three‐dimensional gradient echo T1‐weighted images with fat suppression 20 minutes after injection of gadoxetate disodium were evaluated in correlation with fat signal fraction using the Pearson correlation coefficient and also compared between patients with normal liver parenchyma (n = 115) and with liver steatosis (n = 51) using the Student t‐test.</p> </sec> <sec id="jmri24136-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>The liver–spleen contrast at hepatobiliary phase showed inverse correlations with the fat signal fraction (r = −0.36; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.01), while the liver–spleen relative enhancement ratio showed no statistical correlation with the fat signal fraction (<italic>P</italic> = 0.80). The liver–spleen contrast in the group with steatotic liver was significantly lower than that in the group with normal livers (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001). There was no significant difference in the relative enhancement ratio between the two groups (<italic>P</italic> = 0.85).</p> </sec> <sec id="jmri24136-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>Our results may suggest that hepatic steatosis does not affect the uptake of gadoxetate disodium into hepatocytes and are considered crucial as background knowledge in extending the use of gadoxetate disodium‐enhanced MR imaging to quantitate liver function. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;39:42–50. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of magnetic resonance imaging. Volume 39:Issue 1(2014)
- Journal:
- Journal of magnetic resonance imaging
- Issue:
- Volume 39:Issue 1(2014)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 39, Issue 1 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 39
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0039-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 42
- Page End:
- 50
- Publication Date:
- 2013-09-24
- Subjects:
- Magnetic resonance imaging -- Periodicals
616 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1522-2586 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/jmri.24136 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1053-1807
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5010.791000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3590.xml