Validation of MR thermometry: Method for temperature probe sensor registration accuracy in head and neck phantoms. (March 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tarasek, Matthew R.; Pellicer, Ruben; Hofstetter, Lorne W.; Numan, Wouter C. M.; Bakker, Jurriaan F.; Kotek, Gyula; Togni, Paolo; Verhaart, René F.; Fiveland, Eric W.; Houston, Gavin C.; van Rhoon, Gerard C.; Paulides, Margarethus Marius; Yeo, Desmond Teck Beng
• Is Part Of: International journal of hyperthermia. Volume 30:Number 2(2014)
• Page Start: 142
• Page End: 149
• Publication Date: 2014-03
• Subjects: Thermotherapy -- Periodicals; 615.832
• DOI: 10.3109/02656736.2014.887794
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0265-6736

Abstract

<abstract> <title>Abstract</title> <p> <italic>Purpose</italic>: Magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) is an attractive means to non-invasively monitor <italic>in vivo</italic> temperature during head and neck hyperthermia treatments because it can provide multi-dimensional temperature information with high spatial resolution over large regions of interest. However, validation of MRT measurements in a head and neck clinical set-up is crucial to ensure the temperature maps are accurate. Here we demonstrate a unique approach for temperature probe sensor localisation in head and neck hyperthermia test phantoms. <italic>Methods</italic>: We characterise the proton resonance frequency shift temperature coefficient and validate MRT measurements in an oil–gel phantom by applying a combination of MR imaging and 3D spline fitting for accurate probe localisation. We also investigate how uncertainties in both the probe localisation and the proton resonance frequency shift (PRFS) thermal coefficient affect the registration of fibre-optic reference temperature probe and MRT readings. <italic>Results</italic>: The method provides a two-fold advantage of sensor localisation and PRFS thermal coefficient calibration. We provide experimental data for two distinct head and neck phantoms showing the significance of this method as it mitigates temperature probe localisation errors and thereby increases accuracy of MRT validation results. <italic>Conclusions</italic>: The techniques presented here may be used to simplify calibration experiments that use an interstitial heating device, or any heating method that provides rapid and spatially localised heat distributions. Overall, the experimental verification of the data registration and PRFS thermal coefficient calibration technique provides a useful benchmarking method to maximise MRT accuracy in any similar context.</p> </abstract>