A Comparison of Insufficient Effort Rates, Neuropsychological Functioning, and Neuropsychiatric Symptom Reporting in Military Veterans and Civilians with Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury. (30th September 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A Comparison of Insufficient Effort Rates, Neuropsychological Functioning, and Neuropsychiatric Symptom Reporting in Military Veterans and Civilians with Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury. (30th September 2013)
- Main Title:
- A Comparison of Insufficient Effort Rates, Neuropsychological Functioning, and Neuropsychiatric Symptom Reporting in Military Veterans and Civilians with Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury
- Authors:
- Gfeller, Jeffrey D.
Roskos, P. Tyler
Granacher, Robert P.
Sweet, Jerry J.
Felthous, Alan R. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Neuropsychological evaluation of persons with chronic traumatic brain injury (TBI) symptoms is complicated by multiple factors. The authors explored the impact of mechanism of injury, effort testing performance, and neuropsychiatric status in a sample of military veterans (V‐TBI) and civilians (C‐TBI) with chronic TBI. V‐TBI (<italic>n</italic> = 74), C‐TBI (<italic>n</italic> = 67), and healthy civilian control (C‐HC) participants (<italic>n</italic> = 66), completed a battery of neuropsychological, effort, and self‐report neuropsychiatric measures. Results indicated that C‐HC and C‐TBI participants exhibited comparably low failure rates on effort tests (6% and 3%, respectively). V‐TBI participants exhibited significantly higher rates of failure (18%). Subgroups (<italic>n</italic> = 20) of effort‐screened participants matched for demographics and disability level were compared regarding neuropsychological performance and neuropsychiatric self‐report. Both TBI groups exhibited limited neuropsychological impairment, relative to the C‐HC participants. The V‐TBI group exhibited pronounced neuropsychiatric symptomology compared with the other participant groups. The implications of these findings are discussed for evaluation in the context of disability and litigation. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p> </abstract>
- Is Part Of:
- Behavioral sciences & the law. Volume 31:Number 6(2013:Nov./Dec.)
- Journal:
- Behavioral sciences & the law
- Issue:
- Volume 31:Number 6(2013:Nov./Dec.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 31, Issue 6 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 31
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0031-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 833
- Page End:
- 849
- Publication Date:
- 2013-09-30
- Subjects:
- Mental health laws -- United States -- Periodicals
Psychology, Forensic -- Periodicals
347.3044405 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1002/bsl.2084 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0735-3936
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1877.905000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3904.xml